Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IT audit resources (0th nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kpet - SimonP 14:29, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
Advert. Delete. -SocratesJedi | Talk 17:58, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Not an advert, part of a school project. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Information Technology Audit - Regulation and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Backup Systems and Recovery. Tentative Keep, using the same reasoning I gave in the latter discussion. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 20:03, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep for the same reasons. In the end, however, it still needs to be written in an encyclopedic style, clas project or not. DS1953 20:57, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. Interesting project. JamesBurns 04:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I tried to read the article. It starts without any context. It also reads as original research. It also appears to present opinions as fact. Given this, it would seem to be a Delete unless it gets a major overhaul. Not deleting, still leaves the question of this being an encylopedic topic. I'm not sure. Vegaswikian 04:29, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Is this a copyvio? It looks like it's been cut and pasted from somewhere. Average Earthman 09:00, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-encyclopaedic. Comes off like a term paper and would need a lot of copy editing to make it encyclopedic. There are nuggets of useful information throughout, but more as notes for other articles than in some rehabilitated form of this one. I'd vote keep if "This article should be transwikied to Wikitermpapersource" were an option; anyone up for starting a new sister project ... :-) 66.167.141.93 04:17, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) (contributor since May 2003).
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.