User talk:D0li0

New Page! Sorry about any ill-formated or shottie contributions.

Image:TangoSide.jpg

You have not listed an image license for this picture. Is this your own photo or by what legal right are you including it in Wikipedia? See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for details. Rmhermen 14:07, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

They were given to me by Rick Woodbury (Tango pres) for the purpose of uploading to the Tango page. --D0li0 16:46, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Link format

Capital letters and underscores are not required to form wikilinks. Just write the words normally: An electric vehicle... -- not An Electric_vehicle... You can also write your text in a word processing program and spell check it, then copy and paste it into wikipedia and add the wikilinks then. Someday perhaps we will get a built-in spellchecker. Rmhermen 15:26, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll try to be more diligent in my spelling and grammar corrections. ThanX for clarifying link formats, Guess I should read more of the wikipedia guides, huh. --D0li0 17:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Future energy usage scenarios

This page has been listed for deletion. You might want to add your opinion to the debate. Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Future energy usage scenarios Rmhermen 15:33, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Minor edits

High, please only use the minor edit tag when it is truly a minor edit such as a spelling corection or adding an internal link or something. Pretty much any time you change the way text reads it is not a minor edit. Thanks, and we'll get there someday on the electric vehicle articles. - Taxman ^Talk 02:57, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

Signature tricks

D0li0,
To make a super-neato signature of your choice, you first have to cobble together the html yourself. I happened to know how, but most people just do some from column A and some from cloumn B of other people's signatures. Then under "Preferences->User data" (proabably at the top of your screen near "log in/out") paste your html into the nickname field and tick "raw signatures". Try not to get too fancy though, some people don't like it. (Hmmm... rephrasing that.) Get as fancy as you want, but some people have been known to get grief over that (e.g. User:Theresa Knott).
brenneman ^(t)^(c) 23:00, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images from AustinEV

Hi, in Image:TEVan 425a.jpg you stated that all images coming from http://www.austinev.org/ are in the public domain. Could you verify that somehow? On the website they only say © Copyright AustinEV. Thanks in advance. –Mysid (talk) 09:38, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

On such short notice I've got these EVDL messages...~~EVDL 1 and EVDL 2~~. Here is the permission messages, for future reference ~~[1]. --13 Sep 2005~~ Mon, 12 Sep 2005:20:59:51 - Mike Chancey RE: evalbum copyright or public domain? "Yes, the images are clear to use, free for pro-EV content" --D0li0 10:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This should apply to the following images which I have uploaded. I was confronted about image copyrights per the following ...snip... If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 09:19, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EV conversion schematics

Greetings: I am creating a set of schematics for EV conversion. The first concerns pack isolation during charging and it is at Image:WPEVCContactorCharge.png and has been referenced from the Electric vehicle conversion article. I would appreciate if you could review, correct any text and please sign off as checked if the drawing and text are OK, otherwise message me at User talk:Leonard G. if the drawing must be corrected or if you do not feel qualified to judge the accuracy of the document and text. I will be making some slight cosmetic adjustments to the text within the fuses. Note that this drawing is not ANSI conforming - should it be? Thanks, Leonard G. 18:56, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a comment regarding the fuse location, and I'm not sure where the ac line ground is going. Might want to use curly line intersections. I also sent a message to the EVDL, we'll see if anyone else chimes in with corrections or help with the article. --D0li0 04:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have dropped curly line jumpovers in all my personal schematics - any line crossing is not connected, any line Ting in is, so to make a four wire junction, this is offset to form two Ts. It seems pretty clear to me and offers far less visual clutter. I have added a white break in horizontal lines where verticals cross That is easier with the drawing system I am using. Error on ground and fuse location also corrected. Only thing not on WP is white out under main negative run. I will update if no changes by tomorrow PM. I had put the fuse where it was on my vehicle (which I did not build, but am improving it) - thanks for the heads up, I will move it to the correct location on the vehicle as soon as I can obtain some cables. Leonard G. 04:48, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New diagram obsoleting previous (still on file at Image:WPEVCContactorCharge.png), new at Image:WPEVCContactorCharge2B.png and referenced from article. I decided that a low current switch combined with a high current one or two pole industrial AC contactor would be better. 3PDT or 4PDT switch used and charger does not send current through this switch. Four poles allows ignition to be disabled when in charge mode. This incorporates your suggested graphic change (dots at connections). - Leonard G. 06:10, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New electrical diagram Image:WPEVStartRun.png referenced from Electric vehicle conversion#Startup circuit. Diagram page contains explanation of the details and theory of operation and has a reference to a physical wiring diagram at Image:WPEVStartRunWires.png. These are color coded with matching colors between the two diagrams. I am pretty confident about the accuracy of these as they are a cut and paste adaptation of my as-built finalization of build documents for my current vehicle. These also each reference PDF files for printing at high resolution.

Also: Image:WPEVCContactorCharge.png is now the current one. This uses a single 3PDT (Magnecraft W389ACX-15) for use with external controllers such as used with Avcon. This references a varient for opportunity charging that has start and stop switch, so charger can be turned off before unplugging while still drawing current, avoiding arc at plug contacts. The relay is on order so this has not been completed as to controller pre-charge isolation, but I have installed the second contactor and extended charging lines on my Mazda.

Electric boat

Thanks for your help and support recently on this article. I'm sure that 166.127.1.35 is just trying to wind us up - he's talking nonsense. I've stuck a few more bits of fatherly advice for him on both the Electric Boat's talk page and his own. In the end, his recent edits are so minor that I reckon if we leave them for a while he'll soon get bored, or banned, and the article can move on without his intense involvement. But it's up to you - personally I just don't have the time or the energy right now for him. --Nigelj 21:08, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Electric vehicle conversion moved to Wikibooks

I answered the EVDL member comments after moving the talk. Perhaps you would like to sign up as a WB registered user. I am using the same handle for both wikis, only different passwords. Get to the WB via an inter-wiki link in the electric vehicle conversion article - Leonard G. 06:32, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fcvgc.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Fcvgc.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 21:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with CalCars

Hello. Concerning your contribution, CalCars, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.calcars.org/about.html. As a copyright violation, CalCars appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. CalCars has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:CalCars and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:CalCars with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:CalCars.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Deranged bulbasaur 08:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked Felix to submit the article himself with a summary message similar to mine for the following Andy Frank article, I hope that that is enough. --D0li0 07:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page CalCars do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Thor Malmjursson 04:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Andy Frank

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Andy Frank, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.eaa-phev.org/wiki/Dr._Andrew_Frank. As a copyright violation, Andy Frank appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Andy Frank has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Andy Frank and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Andy Frank with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Andy Frank.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

Creative commons licensed material cannot be copied to Wikipedia, because the GFDL (wikipedia's license) and the creative commons licences are not compatible.Deranged bulbasaur 08:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After it's deletion I have recreated the article with the summary of "Copy with updates of my own original work from http://www.eaa-phev.org/wiki/Dr._Andrew_Frank, I'm releasing it here at Wikipedia under the GFDL" which I hope now covers any copyright issues. Please let me know if I still need to send a message to the "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" address... --D0li0 07:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other PHEV chatter

Thanks for the work on cd/cs/blended modes - I threw that in at 3 AM Europe time and will flesh them out over the next few days! Jack Rosebro 09:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Volted

Thanks for the props on the site....as for point #10 I think that mean linking direcly to a social bookmarking site. Plenty of news sites link out to these tyoes of sites and they are up :) The guy who owns the page has no love--72.204.229.109 05:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magne Charge

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Magne Charge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 12:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I personally think it fails to assert its notability. Perhaps a section in the Delco Electronics article might be a better idea? Anyway I'll give you some time to work on it. :) Cheers! -- lucasbfr ^talk 11:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historic electric vehicles

Generally, the term "historic" suffers from severe interpretation problems, as it could refer to things that are a set age (20, 50, or 100 years old), things that are no longer in production, or things that were of particular significance in some time period. (Categories for vintage cars have also suffered interpretation problems.) I was about to nominate this category for merging into Category:Electric vehicles, but I thought I would contact you first to find out whether you would be willing to find some other way to categorize these vehicles. I would actually suggest categorizing by decade, as decade is objectively defined. I also liked your suggestion about a category for prototype electric vehicles in Category Talk:Historic electric vehicles. What are your thoughts? Dr. Submillimeter 14:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plug-in hybrid

I know you've worked hard to improve plug-in hybrid; please consider supporting it at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Plug-in hybrid/archive2. BenB4 17:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 14:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Electric vehicle categories

Template:Electric vehicle categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:AlbrightSW200A-675.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dump charging

The article Dump charging has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no evidence that this term is nothing beyond a neologism, unable to find any reliable sources referencing this term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Sable232 (talk) 17:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, D0li0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, D0li0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Commuter Cars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commuter Cars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commuter Cars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historic electric vehicles has been nominated for renaming

Category:Historic electric vehicles has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No coffee, please. (talk) 18:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Elementbox header-imagemap

Template:Elementbox header-imagemap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dump charging moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dump charging. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dump charging

Hello, D0li0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dump charging, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Genset trailer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genset trailer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genset trailer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 12:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pusher trailer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pusher trailer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pusher trailer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 12:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]