Talk:WWE Backlash

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWE Backlash article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

WWE Backlash is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 6, 2009	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
August 6, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Former featured list candidate

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 October 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	WWE Backlash is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

backlash 2008

The card hasn't been confirmed yet. Please don't add your own fantasy card. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.180.120.158 (talk) 17:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Orton vs Matt Hardy has not been confirmed, and neither has Big Show vs Khali —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.247.69 (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Van Dam v. Shelton Benjamin

I deleted this match from Backlash 2006 because it has not been confirmed yet. 152.228.242.165 04:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC) gydyfdgfuigfgsbhdh bjhghgbe ujihioehehguindsjkh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.196.62.191 (talk) 19:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last American PPV

Since a editor keeps saying that it should be noted that Backlash 2002 was the last American PPV under the WWF name (the last PPV under the WWF name was the UK-only PPV Insurrextion 2002, which took place 1 day before they became WWE). I don't find it all that notable, and several other editors have also removed it. Since this user continues to add it back though, I thought I would bring it here to see what the consensus is. TJ Spyke 07:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think it is notable, but I sadly can't think of a way to explain why I feel as such. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 14:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I don't understand why it would be notable. --Naha|^(talk) 15:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand either. Dav nel 03 21:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its notable in the way that its notable when the lat wcw ppv was because its the last one. While the insurecction ppv is technical the last one insurrection is a uk only event.LifeStroke420 (talk) 03:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Add picture

Can you add the Backlash 2008 promotional poster it's on the wwe site im too busy to do it so... Meepboy (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Backlash 2008 Article

Is Backlash going to get its own article? If not, why? All other PPV's are getting their own articles. ^{-GuffasBorgz7-} 11:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

create one, link there. simple, isn't it? Diivoo (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already tried making Backlash (2008) but someone reverted it for some reason. ^{-GuffasBorgz7-} 20:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its still to early to make one because there is not enough info for it yet . This has been discussed at the wp:pw talk page. MA TT 21:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

who cares? the event is next. Diivoo (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree Diivoo. Because as the weeks go by, more and more information will be able to be put into it. ^{-GuffasBorgz7-} 20:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As the weeks go by there will be enough info to make its own article MA TT 21:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manger's

Please add that in the 1999 match between Goldust and The Godfather,that several of Godfather's Ho's was there outside to manage him,please add this and here is my proof.

The Godfather w/Five Hos def Goldust w/Blue Meanie to retain..

http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/results/wweppv/backlash99.php

Also at the 2002 Backlash,Jeff Hardy had Lita as his manager,here is my proof.

MATCH: Brock Lesnar vs Jeff Hardy w/Lita.

http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/results/wweppv/backlash02.php

Jargon

I understand this article is under expansion and I'm glad to see that. But to inform people that this article still contains jargon I've placed a tag in the article. Match types are not explained among other things. That needs to be fixed.--WillC 23:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you obsessed with dumbing down every PPV article? Most of the articles you put the jargon tag on do NOT need it as not every little thing that exists has to be explained (that's why linking exists). Articles are allowed to have some jargon. TJ Spyke 23:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ones that people can understand quickly are allowed. But like a Hell in a Cell match for intense is not. I'm trying to make sure everyone can understand it. I've placed the jargon tags on articles that need it. And yes, every 2009 PPV event has needed it because they aren't following the correct formats.--WillC 00:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on WWE Backlash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MATCHES

dean Ambrose vs John cena Bongumenzi Mzobe (talk) 04:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Source? - Galatz ^Talk 04:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backlash 1999

Backlash 1999 was NOT an In Your House PPV. Yes, the poster that was released months earlier does say In Your House on it, but at some point between the poster's release and the actual PPV itself, WWE dropped the In Your House name. If you watch the PPV, and even the episode of Sunday Night Heat that preceded the PPV, not once throughout the whole event is the name "In Your House" mentioned. Not by the commentators or wrestlers and not even an on-screen graphic. Also the cover of the original home video release does not say In Your House either. Every other In Your House from May 1995 until St. Valentine's Day Massacre has the name shown on screen, mentioned on screen and it's included on the cover of the home video release. OldSkool01 (talk) 16:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]