User talk:Chris Buckey

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Chris Buckey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

81.156.100.136 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Woozlepants". The reason given for Woozlepants's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: OverlordQ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Actually, reviewing the evidence, it seems clear that this account is being run by the same person who runs Woozlepants; this request was made 2 minutes after the Woozlepants account was blocked, and yet this account had been inactive since April. How is it that this account becomes suddenly active after months of nothing, a mere 2 minutes after an abusive account has been blocked? Based on that evidence, I have extended the block from an autoblock to a direct block per the ban on running good hand/bad hand accounts. If you wish to have this block lifted, you had better have a pretty good explanation for the next person to review. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Augustus P. Cooke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Augustus P. Cooke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augustus P. Cooke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]