Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11½

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Fahrenheit 9/11
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Merge and redirect, 23 August 2007, see discussion.
Keep, 19 July 2005, see discussion.

Hoax?

Hoax? i found nothing relevant anyway. The external link in the Internet Movie Database was written by "anonymous".

I found some comments and the original article but no others informations even at http://www.michaelmoore.com/ no more ;-) --Neuromancien 02:41, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Move to Fahrenheit 9/11½

Can an admin move this to Fahrenheit 9/11½ ... thanks!--Sonjaaa 00:05, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

Wrong info

On Michael moore's page it says this planned for 2006 release, here it says 2007.--60.226.28.35 10:31, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Does it matter? It's crystal ball and should've been deleted as such. Grue 12:30, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

information vs propaganda

I do agree that Moore's "stuff", might show a strong opinion, but propaganda is not the right term for it, as it implies a judgment. I'd rather use "information" because it's more generic (you can have good or bad information), and sticks to Wikipedia's policy of NOT giving an opinion. Hiding "propaganda" into "opinionated commentary" might also sound tricky. For these reasons I did reverted - again - the edit to Fahrenheit 9/11½. Nova77 23:21, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this protected?

Pointless Could someone please amend the text to the following:

#REDIRECT [[Fahrenheit 9/11#Fahrenheit 9/11½]]  {{R with possibilities}}

Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]