Talk:News magazine

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

It's all in the west... mainly USA and English language as well. Gerritholl 22:44, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

ISSNs

Not a single ISSN is listed on this page. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to untag this page and tag the individual pages on publications that could have an ISSN listed but do not? --Keesiewonder ^talk 22:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm untagging this page as needing one or more ISSNs since I've created a stub for 2512 (magazine) and inserted ISSNs for all print news magazines referenced in this article. The non-print news magazines discussed in the article most likely do not have ISSNs. Keesiewonder ^talk 03:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The list for the U.S. is totally inaccurate...

A newsmagazine reports on news in a neutral fashion; while it has opinions and editorials like a newspaper, it keeps them separate from the news articles. U.S. News, Newsweek, and Time all fall into that category. But the New Republic, the Nation, National Review, and the Week are political and cultural opinion magazines, not newsmagazines. Whomever put them in this article must be a preteen who hasn't figured that out yet because their political consciousness hasn't really developed. If no one produces a citation to a reliable source for any of those four that calls them a newsmagazine within a couple of weeks, I'm pulling them from this article. --Coolcaesar 06:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Challenging bizarre move by User:Thumperward on 6 January 2010

User:Thumperward moved this article from Newsmagazine to News magazine on 6 January 2010, citing WP:ENGLISH.

Most educated native English speakers are well aware that the common spelling in the English language for over 50 years has been "newsmagazine" (with no space). (I personally figured that out by the time I was 10 or 11, but to be fair, I was precocious and was already reading Time and Newsweek regularly.) Examples of this spelling on Google Books include: [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Any objections before I fix this mess by moving the article back to the correct title? --Coolcaesar (talk) 12:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on being precocious, I guess. I'd note the following:

20% of those last fifty years have coincided with this article being at the present title, so either it's been hidden from "educated native English speakers" for that time through some sort of advanced stealth technology or this isn't the clear-cut case that's being asserted.
The actual styling of the term when it was originally created in 2004 (by Aaron Swartz: RIP) was "news magazine" even if the title wasn't, and that remained the case for the article prose even right up to the edit before the move. If "newsmagazine" were such an overwhelmingly correct term, one wonders why editors continued to add a space in the prose all that time.
All the sources provided (and Time and Newsweek for that matter) are US English. So far as I can see Collins is the only major British English dictionary to include it. This isn't really a problem (and indeed, Aaron was American, so by convention we'd use US English anyway) but it does offer a suggestion other than the one provided (that I and others are illiterate philistines) as to why this hasn't been a hot issue.

That said, this move was the result of a two-word edit summary ten years ago and the move back wouldn't require admin privileges anyway, so it's unclear as to why you didn't just go ahead and make the move. If you do, then be a good citizen and fix up the article prose accordingly. Cheers. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)09193471176[reply]