User talk:Bgruber

The Kinks

I realise that some of this is a ripoff, but since then A LOT of work has been done on the article, so I'm mostly keen on keeping the material on, than ruling it out completely. Many of the portions are changed, deleted, revisited by me and couple of other guys, making it quite a lot different material than the obvious spine of allmusic. So, if you excuse me dude, I'm reverting it back. I worked along with a couple of other persons on it many for months, I like it, I will continue to work on it in the future and I think that by now it's completely different story and morning glory than the allmusic article. I don't think that there's so much left in allmusic article that deserves reversion, as I said that it has completely evolved and emerged as a standalone article rather than a complete rip-off.

Thanks for your attention. Your sincerely: Painbearer 21:13, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Much of the material has been changed and is twice much longer than the material in Allmusic. Give me some time and I will rewrite the problematic portions of it. I don't think it's such a "blatant plagiarizm" as you define it, but in the name of good and healthy communications, I will do some more work and will try to perephrase the more obvious take-offs. In a month or so, the "bad" will be put out.

Please friend, show some respect: Painbearer 10:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

As you can see man, many people are still working on it. About 4 or 5. The article is always changing to the better and I assure you it will change if you just give some time. Give some time, man don't be so pushing. Don't bitch around, and the copyvio will be no more... or at least not so blatant. Meanwhile, I really recommend to you read this stuff and then read word by word the article in Allmusic. I think it's a different story and morning glory.

Respect dude: Painbearer 14:41, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Ina Garten article

Hi! You once edited the Ina Garten entry for Wikipedia. This article is currently up for both a peer review and good article nomination. If you find the time, please stop by the peer review page and offer your input. Thanks! Air.dance 06:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

re: Townsend Harris High School

Hello Bgruber!

Regarding your inclusion of Ishle Yi Park as an alumnus: unless you provide a citation supporting this person's inclusion, it will likely be deleted again. It is incumbant on the person making the edit to include the citation, otherwise it can be regarded as either a good faith (but erroneous) edit, or vandalism. If your claim is true, consider making the appropriate citation. Good luck and happy editing! LonelyBeacon 01:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello back!

If you check the edit logs on that particular article, I never actually reverted your edit. I did revert a previous edit by another editor (I think it was a listing of athletes who won some conference championship or something like that. I noticed your edit, and your request not to delete it. I jsut thought I would drop a friendly suggestion about adding the citation (because you seemed worried about an editor deleting it. The citation looks pretty solid to me! I'm not sure if you got to this school, but that alumni list is pretty darn impressive! Good luck and happy editing! LonelyBeacon 03:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC) and ..... if you've run into problems with editors, I really apologize. The comment you left on my page was most polite, and I certainly agree that editors do sometimes get overzealous ... including me. You do try to assume good faith, yet sometimes it is really difficult to tell the difference. For some reason, I really believed you were doing good, so I chose not to delete, and drop a "suggestion" instead. LonelyBeacon 04:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah!

It took me a while to see what you meant. Apologies are certainly in order. I am very sorry for that. As you see, there were some vandals that came in after you, and I did a blanket edit back to the bot edit. Yours got swept in with the rest, and it should not have been so. I will be more careful of such things in the future. Thank you for pointing that out to me. LonelyBeacon 04:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bgruber. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)