Talk:Goodies (Ciara album)

Goodies (Ciara album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 22, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
October 23, 2010	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Goodies (Ciara album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merging from And I

I merged And I into this article as the song isn't notable. There are a number of criteria at Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines/Songs that songs should meet to be given their own articles, and "And I" does not meet any of these, or at least nowhere near enough. Extraordinary Machine 17:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The musically guidelines are guidelines not official policy. A google test for Ciara "and I" gets hundreds of thousands of results. This is one four well writen single pages. I am reverting as number 27 in the R&B charts is reasonably notable. By merging you are destroying context which is provided by the four pages. I have been contributing to music related articles for a while now, I wouldn't of reverted the merge if it wasn't notable. Q Q 19:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

To quote user:FuriousFreddy: if a song article is nothing but a recounting of how the song was made, and how well it did, without explaining that it was, in some way, important and influential to the music industry, there's really no reason for it. Just write good album articles, and selected articles on the important singles and album tracks, and let's keep the encyclopedia balanced. Encyclopedias aren't supposed to be "complete"; they are supposed to provide overviews and guide users to further information on a subject if they want to go beyond the standard level. Something like a Ciara fan wiki would be a fine place to have an article on every Ciara song, but a general-purpose encyclopedia is not. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pop music issues and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines/Songs. Why write dozens of short articles on singles, with no chances of actual expansion short of padding and marketing-report material (chart positions), when they can be combined into one album article? I would also appreciate if you didn't accuse me of "trying to destroy" the And I article and ask others to "watch out" for it. Extraordinary Machine 00:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge The song isn't notable on it's own and there's room on the album page for songs from the album. Kerowyn 00:44, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While we're at it, we could also merge the other singles from the album and create a new section in the "Goodies" article, something like "Notable singles from the album".Kerowyn 00:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although i'm not anytpe of administrator on this site i'd rather Ciara's singles not be mushed in with her album. Its just easier to go to each separate single page and read up on the song's composition, makeup, and meaning. It would be hard to do this for all artists though because i know for Mariah Carey's most recent album each single has a good sized page on it which covers the making of the video, meaning of the video, song, what they went through to make the song, etc etc etc. And i think it would be kinda strange to have some singles with a decent amount of info smashed in the same article as its corresponding album while other artists have their own separate single pages. Just my opinion. Thanx :D

Well, according to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines/Songs unless there's a good reason for a seperate article, songs should be described under the album article. Granted, wiki-policy isn't wiki-law, but it's a good guideline. The "well, other artists do it" arguement isn't too valid because they aren't supposed to do either. It'd be nice if we could do a similar merge to most of the song article in Wikipedia, but the task is fairly staggering. Kerowyn 00:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected the remaining song articles here. They consisted of little more than chart information and excessively detailed and poorly-written music video synopses (at 1, 2 Step, the reader learns "Ciara struts her stuff down the street"). Not every hit single needs a Wikipedia article, especially when the page for the album is as short as this one was. This is not because of a bias against Ciara or any other black musician; in fact I merged the articles for Lindsay Lohan songs to their albums for the same reasons. Extraordinary Machine 20:12, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in 2004, the song "1, 2 Step" and it's video were big hits, making quite an impact and it basically launched Ciara's career. Although they may not have been written well, I think a good clean up would help. ScreamFlyDream 22:14, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the one above, although "1,2 Step" was not as big of a chart topper like "Goodies" was, it still was a huge hit in the US and in other countries and it ranked #5 at the Billboard End-Of-The-Year charts of 2005 where Goodies could only hit #9, that further launched her career. 1,2 Step held the number 2 spot for about 7+ weeks ya kno lol The sinlge also went 3x platinum69.251.101.82 11:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Jak D69.251.101.82 11:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where's The Album Cover?

Get it back now! --Miss Ciara 09:04, 11 June 2006

Lead changes

IP user 68.79.93.99 insists on making a drastic change to the lead's prose, and has not given substantial reason in his edit summaries to change it. Per WP:MOS, "Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a substantial reason. Revert-warring over optional styles is unacceptable. If discussion cannot determine which style to use in an article, defer to the style used by the first major contributor." The original version seems sufficient and was passed through GA. The IP user's revision seems to move around parts without much structure to the topics discussed. (Difference between revisions) Dan56 (talk) 14:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per Dan56/WP:MOS. There is no need to change the lead if the article passed its GA review. It can be if the article is expanded or updated but I see the IP was only changing a few words around. Oz ^talk 05:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Goodies (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Goodies (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Goodies (Ciara album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120720033330/http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2012/07/sales_slump_usher_chris_brown.php?page=2 to http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2012/07/sales_slump_usher_chris_brown.php?page=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]