Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bagrationi

Bagrationi

Object. Too many lists, too little prose. --Oldak Quill 10:22, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Agreed with Oldak. If you can turn the article into something more substantial, I will change my vote. Linuxbeak 12:51, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
Object strongly. There's an ongoing dispute over an important historical point, namely whether the dynasty decended from an Armenian family. Strong objection until it's resolved. That, and the article is mistitled: "Bagrationi" is not used in any English-language scholarship; the form "Bagratids" is preferred in every text I've looked at. Isomorphic 14:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Isomorphic fully ignored all data of the Georgian historiography and Georgian historical sources. Unfortunately, his "research" is very tendentious. -- Levzur 14 May 2005

Considering that this is an English language Wikipedia, wouldn't it be of more use to users if the resources were in English? It's hard not to overlook research that is not provided either in one's mother tongue, or in a widely-used language like French or German. -- llywrch 16:49, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Object There is next to no information in this article, except for dates and many, many links to inexistant articles. Phils 10:53, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]