Jump to content

Talk:Cessna Skymaster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A reference would be appreciated to the incident described.

As for the C337 accidents during the same year, NTSB MIA94WA092 describes a take-off nonfatal mishap by the same operator. (The other 4 accidents involving a C337 that year were all fatal). BACbKA 21:12, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Center Line Thrust

[edit]

The Centerline Thrust notation on a pilots certificate is a restriction, not an endorsement, ie a pilot without it on his multi engine certificate can still fly a centerline thrust aircraft, but a pilot with the a centerline thrust restriction can not act as PIC in a normal multi engine aircraft. PPGMD 02:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brothers to the Rescue

[edit]

Although the Brothers to the Rescue story is undeniably related to the Skymaster, there is a dedicated WP article on the subject. I suggest we either start working on an Accident/Incident list, as is common in other aircraft pages, or add a reference to the BttR article in the See also section. In any case, I propose the Operational history section, including the irrelevant Aircraft type clubs subsection (name one light aircraft which does not have such a club...), be deleted. The fact that the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection used Skymasters can be moved to the Variants section. Ma.rkus.nl (talk) 20:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the main Brothers to the Rescue article is now much longer than what is contained in this article I have replaced the duplication tag with a main article template. I believe the existing shorter version in this article is appropriate for this topic and the main template will send readers to the main article for more detail if they are interested. - Ahunt (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User:Murrayabc123 deleted this whole section with the edit summary Removed brothers to the rescue portion due to it being a political statement. Having reread it I don't see it as a "political statement", but as a cited and factual account of one operational use of this aircraft. It doesn't seem to be any different than the operational use sections of other aircraft articles, such as Zlín_Z_42#Use_by_LTTE. The main Brothers to the Rescue article contains much more detail on the incident. I have reverted the removal, but if anyone would like to see it removed then it should be discussed in detail here first, explaining why and gain a concensus to remove it. - Ahunt (talk) 22:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User:Murrayabc123 You can't just keep deleting content that you disagree with citing the same Removed brothers to the rescue portion due to it being a political statement. You need to discuss your reasons here and gain consensus. - Ahunt (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I concur that the "Brothers" section should remain in some form, though probably with less detail. ALso, usage should not be in the Variants section, but in Operational history. As to the Type club section, this is listed in other light aircraft articles. Ahunt and I do disagree on this, but it's not an area of strong contenion between us. Perhaps it needs to be taken up at WT:AIR. Until then, the type club section should remain. - BillCJ (talk) 01:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I copied the main details to the Brothers article since that was sourced here. The details about where exactly they were downed and other details did not seem important here. If I removed something needed here, add it back. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That looks okay - enough detail for this article and the main article has the rest. No need for too much duplication. - Ahunt (talk) 17:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Jeff. That looks good to me too. - BillCJ (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conversions/Modifications

[edit]

With the recent earthquake in Haiti I was observing via Google maps and found the following view. Could these be the Summit Sentry aircraft sold to Haiti in the 1980s? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jetfried (talk • contribs) 21:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are 337s all right, but they aren't flying anywhere anymore! Too bad. - Ahunt (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier "Skymasters" ?

[edit]

There must have been earlier "Skymasters". Churchill writes, in his book "The Second World War", that he flew at Christmas 1944 with his private "Skymaster" to Athens; refuelling was in Naples. <KDR. 110716.>

Nothing to do with this Skymaster it was a four-engined transport see Douglas C-54 Skymaster. MilborneOne (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, common term, different aircraft. - Ahunt (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cessna Skymaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked - Ahunt (talk) 21:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cessna Skymaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cessna_Skymaster&oldid=1200082811"