Talk:National Three Peaks Challenge

Although I think the "opponents of" section is a little too prominent in the article coming before the route description, this is a very good article, well done contributors. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

My original article didn't have anything about criticisms, and should have done. I think the paragraph is definitely worthy of inclusion, and if I lived in the vicinity of one of the peaks I suspect I would be glad to see the bad side of the challenge given prominence. In accordance with Pcb21's comments I will move the criticisms to after the route description and give it its own section. If Cambyses feels that it deserves more promincence and sends it back up to the top I wouldn't object. Trilobite 18:25, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I do indeed thing it deserves some prominence, so will indeed move it back to the top. The standard route stuff (which is excellent, by the way) is the kind of detail which will be read mostly by the really keen; I think the debate on the pros and cons of the challenge is significant enough that the casual reader should at least be aware of its existence. This is especially true because the rest of the article is (reasonably enough, since the challenge sounds like great fun!) extremely upbeat, and somebody not reading to the very bottom might never suspect there was a negative side.... Best wishes, Cambyses 00:37, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Trilobite 00:52, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I think the criticisms section is a bit misleading - it gives the impression of hordes of walkers crowding the mountains out night and day; I've done the challenge twice (July 1996 and August 2006) and both times encountered only a handful of other people doing the same thing66.134.170.155 (talk) 16:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Route

Quite a few years ago some friends of mine set the record for doing the Three Peaks by running all the way in a relay run. They did what I always thought was the traditional route of starting with one foot in the sea at Fort William and finishing with one foot in the sea at Caernarfon. When was the route shortened so that it starts and finishes at the base of each mountain? (I think they still hold the record) --jmb 00:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I notice this comment has been removed from the main page as "trivia". I still think it is a valid to record when the route was shortened so the runners start and finish as near to the first and last summit accessible by vehicle, if anyone knows? --jmb 18:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Three Peaks Challenge web site [1] says "Two schools of thought exist on how to start and finish the challenge", one touching the sea and the other from the car parks at the base of the mountains. Whether either is more 'official' than the other I do not know, though the site does say that the latter is the usual route. 86.5.163.70 (talk) 18:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC) dww[reply]

A six peaks version of this challenge already exists and is run every year by the charity Wateraid. [2]. Perhaps someone who knows what they are doing can edit the main text. SJ21 (talk) 10:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some re-structuring, to collect together mentions of the various related challenges. (The article is about "Three peaks", so should stay focussed on that.) Feline Hymnic (talk) 21:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tilman's Challenge

I'ver put a note on Bill Tilman's version of the 3 peaks (NO motorised transport) and it's evolution into the 'Three peaks yacht race'. Bob aka Linuxlad 10:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scafell Pike

I've changed some of the description on this section. I don't believe at all that Scafell Pike is climbed 'far less' than the other two, and the path to the top from Wasdale Head is very easy to follow, even in low cloud, as there are large cairns going all the way up by the side.Clear air turbulence 23:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Located

To editor Stemonitis: I doubt we would agree on "located", since you've reinstated it, but I don't feel that strongly about it. When talking about a place it seems to me a redundant word. All the best, Tony Holkham (Talk) 22:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I may not have explained myself well in the edit summary, for which I apologise. "It is at the western end of the Grampian Mountains ..." is not a natural-sounding sentence in normal, idiomatic English. Rather, it suggests to the reader that the sentence will continue "... that [something occurred]", which is not the intended meaning. Note also that the three sections in questions are summaries of three other articles, all of which include, quite reasonably, the word "located". Not every word that can be removed should be. --Stemonitis (talk) 22:22, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Three Peaks Challenge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]