User talk:Wilus

Hello Wilus and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Rutter

Thanks for tackling John Rutter, it's much better now. Opus33 15:19, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Cleobury

Re Stephen Cleobury, my recollection is that the 'scandal' was well before 2003 - maybe 2000 or 2001. (Maybe Emma Hebblethwaite had her child in 2003, but if so this was well after the original events.) Ben Finn 22:21, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right – my feeling however is that the whole thing should go; he's not in Wikipedia for his marital history.Wilus 09:23, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I noticed you reverted my edit. I appreciate why you did this - however, my motivation for changing it was so there would be a direct link to the _Choir_ of St John's article, instead of just to the College. I certainly think the former is more relevant than the latter. Stefan (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion

Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 23:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert Parry

There is certainly a blue plaque marking the site of his house in Bournemouth, and I have added a note on that.--Holdenhurst 17:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ruddigore

Hello, Wilus. Thank you for your excellent edits to Ruddigore. I have restored a few of the items you deleted. Ruddigore has not received as much attention as some of the other articles at the Gilbert and Sullivan Wikiproject, but we will get to it eventually. In the meantime, I think that the items that I restored can be supported with citations from (additional) reliable sources, and we will add those when we reach Ruddigore. Our project previously worked on Thespis (opera), which is now a Featured Article, and we are working on Trial by Jury, which is a Good Article and hope to improve it to Featured Article. If you are interested in helping out, check out WP:G&S. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicholas Cleobury

The article Nicholas Cleobury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musician

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OCNative (talk) 10:42, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Driscoll

Hi - I read your comment concerning the newspaper-references on the discusssion-page of the Bobby Driscoll-article. The reason why most of the links lead to blank pages on oyla.de is simply, because the scanned original accounts were once located on my former website on Bobby Driscoll, but which I deleted long ago, though. I frankly don't know why the blank pages on oyla.de still appear. It seems to be an internal system's bug of oyla.de. Regards--Bylot (talk) 17:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wilus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wilus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wilus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wilus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Anglican church music

Thank you for quality articles about Anglican church music ("a small start at a large topic!") such as Anglican chant, and its people such as John Stainer, Stephen Cleobury, Colin Mawby and Hamilton Clarke, for service from 2003, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2315 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:27, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]