Jump to content

Talk:Fitzgerald Inquiry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How to cite the report?

[edit]

I've added a link to the Fitzgerald Report itself. I scanned it for a "recommended citation" hint but didn't find one. I don't often cite Queensland government documents; if you do, please replace the reference with a better one. Thisrod 04:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any patriotic Queensladers out there...

[edit]

Who'd like to help get this thing expanded, please jump on in. I'd do so myself, but I was about 2 at the time and don't have any real clue where to start with something this massive. BigHaz 11:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, not too patriotic. The major finding of FRC was the corruption of Lewis and Herbert. The other convictions were fairly minor, by today's standards, and the article does not reflect this properly. E.G., Harvey took her husband to the Formula 1 race, and paid for the $5k tickets with the ministerial credit card. Seeing as she was the minister for transport, and had organized the race, some argument can be put forward that it was government business. The husband's presence made it wrong. The race organizers should have given her the tickets, considering she got the whole event going.

The corruption of Herbert and Lewis had been common knowledge since the days of Whitrod, more than 10yrs beforehand. The FRC cost $30M, merely to find out what was already known by a lot of people. Petersen and particularly Hinze were the obstacles to reform.203.213.60.118 (talk) 22:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fitzgerald Inquiry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fitzgerald Inquiry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous comments

[edit]

sex accusations was a very big part oof te inquiry as it was discovered that there were a number of illegal brothels in Queensland. (21 alone in the Metropolitan area). Electoral boundaries 'Gerrymander' was a key emphasis of the Fitzgerald Report and needs more attention in the Wikipedia article. WHEN did this happen?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fitzgerald_Inquiry&oldid=1195791695"