Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waah

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 09:03, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Waah

I just keep thinking of that beer commercial. "Wazaaah!" Uncle G 18:37, 2005 Feb 2 (UTC)

And how is what you were thinking about makes a page applicable to be deleted. The reason i've created this page is that when this game was mentioned in a discussion i've had i did what i normally do... ie looked for it on wiki, and it didn't exist, so then i've had to create a reference to it. Beta_M ^talk, |^contrib (Ë-Mail)

Delete Naah! --Lee Hunter 21:19, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
(no vote) I think it's wikipedia policy for at least nominators to give reasons for deletion. I suppose the problem here is "non-notability". Kappa 21:51, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
delete cos it's unverifiable and the article is unencyclopedic. Mozzerati 22:26, 2005 Feb 2 (UTC)
Delete. Unverifiable, unencyclopedic, non-notable...have I missed anything? — Gwalla | Talk 00:08, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 00:38, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. I tried googling waah and game and got 10,000 hits, but didn't see any relevant ones. I wasn't about to look through 10,000 articles so I tried "Waah game" and got about a dozen (again, nothing relevent), and waah "stupid question" (200+, didn't see anything there either). I'm calling this unverified and unencyclopedic. -R. fiend 19:37, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. I'm trying to work out whether this is the dumbest game I've ever heard of. It may be, and I wish I hadn't. It's certainly not particularly encyclopaedic. Oh, and googling "waah game" and "stupid question" gets zero hits. Grutness|^hello? 08:58, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

All right stop robbing it in, delete it already, i'll see if this info can be put together with something else, and then maybe it'll be encyclopaedic Beta_M ^talk, |^contrib (Ë-Mail)

Delete. Not notable. Unverifiable. Probably the author just made it up, meaning its "original research". --BM 18:15, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Actually you are wrong, but as i've already said, i'm giving up trying to prove anything about this page. I mean look at Penis game, with that in mind Waah is definately fake, right? Beta_M ^talk, |^contrib (Ë-Mail)

OK, so you didn't make it up. It still does not seem notable, and if you have some information that it really exists, please let us have it. Who plays this game? Where is it played? What is the history of the game? It is so stupid, it is hard to believe that it really exists except in someone's imagination. --BM 22:29, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.