Talk:Ko Chang district

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the districts task force.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on January 03, 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Area

I am confused about the area of the island. The official Thai statistics gives the area of the King Amphoe with 154.8 km² (this includes some minor islands). However Lonely Planet states a total area of 492 km² for Ko Chang alone. A little later in LP it says the National Park has 192 km² of land area, and 85% of the island belong to the NP - that'd mean about 226 km² for the complete island. Ko Samui (according to LP) has 247 km² or 228.7 km² (complete Amphoe), so depending on what number to use Ko Chang is second or third largest. andy 11:04, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some serious editing

This article needs some serious editing. No time to do it myself. Jalwikip (talk) 12:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit, January 2012

In copy editing this, I've ended up cutting the size by about half. If was written almost entirely as a tourist brochure (presumably the TAT copy mentioned above), and was full of duplications, puffery, and stuff that really wasn't relevant. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]