User talk:Justanyone

Hi Justanyone, welcome to Wikipedia. Message for you on Talk:Electrostatic. -- Tim Starling 07:44, Nov 16, 2003 (UTC)

Hi Justanyone--

I liked your page on municipal government. You may not have realised that there are already pages on local government and county. I've rewritten the start of your page a bit to connect with them. Would you be able to improve the US material in local government? I've just written a bit in now, because there was nothing, but I'm only a visiting Brit, so what do I know? seglea 07:10, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)

I just deleted the page you created at E-God. Creating nonsense like this is considered vandalism, and will always be deleted. Thank you. Graham :) 22:22, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Jet engine image

I notice there is no license notice on this image:

File:SimplifiedJetEngineDiagram.jpg

which you uploaded. The copyright on the image itself suggests that you own the copyright. If this is the case, are you licensing it under GFDL? The copyright notice suggests you are not releasing it to the public domain. Placing a license notice on the page would clarify Wikipedia's legal position on using the image. —Tkinias 05:01, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Kevin,

I replaced your JPEG version with a smaller, cleaner PNG one. If you saved your version as PNG, it might even improve slightly more. You can probably easily reduce the number of colours used to 32. Either use a tool know for compressing PNG well, or use pngcrush to squeeze out the last few bits.

Thx, --branko 21:34, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)~

Doing a grand job on Jet Engine. I think Intake and Nozzle are both components. Wikiwizzy 13:59, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Images

I noticed that you contributed an image to Arc de Triomphe and several very nice images to Gallery of Arc de Triomphe photographs. You have also released this image into the public domain. Does that go for just that image, for all of the Arc de Triomphe images that you contributed, or all of the images that you contributed? If not, what licence are you releasing them under? - Didactohedron 07:33, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

Sources for Suppressive fire

Hello, good work on Suppressive fire, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Suppressive fire? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET if you wish to review some of the different citation methods. Thanks! Lupin|talk|popups 03:45, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo (programming language)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Apollo (programming language), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Apollo (programming language). Elfits FOR GREAT JUSTICE (klat) 19:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Apollo (programming language)

I have nominated Apollo (programming language), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo (programming language). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Pascal.Tesson (talk) 18:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Scholarship hall

I have nominated Scholarship hall, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scholarship hall. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC) SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arc_de_triomphe_viewfromtoptowest.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Arc_de_triomphe_viewfromtoptowest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand Barriere Bridge

The article Grand Barriere Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bridge. No significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus (talk) 10:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saphonian

The article Saphonian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, only two external ones.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Obtund^Talk 17:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Indiana U logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Indiana U logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Indiana U logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Indiana U logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gerrymandering

Hi, Kevin. I reverted your recent edit to gerrymandering because it looked like original research, to me. If you have any reliable sources for the solution you suggested, please go ahead and reinstate your text, with appropriate citations. Thanks, Dricherby (talk) 20:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, Justanyone. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect:Current Ratification Status of Amendments to the United States Constitution

The page you created, Current Ratification Status of Amendments to the United States Constitution is being redirected to List of amendments to the United States Constitution as the information on the former page is presented within the latter, which is a broader article on the same subject.Drdpw (talk) 20:24, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Letter George Washington Mohammed Ben Abdallah 1 Dec 1789

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Letter George Washington Mohammed Ben Abdallah 1 Dec 1789 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 15:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Letter George Washington Mohammed Ben Abdallah 1 Dec 1789 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Letter George Washington Mohammed Ben Abdallah 1 Dec 1789 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letter George Washington Mohammed Ben Abdallah 1 Dec 1789 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 13:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Justanyone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Justanyone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American cities page

Hello, I'm just curious, what happened to your idea of making a page with all the cities in the United States? It sounds like a good idea. NikolaiHo^☎️ 02:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've had an large page removed, despite my hard work creating it, because it was too large. Apparently listing all this info in one place is against some guideline or another.JustAnyone (talk) 11:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Justanyone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Auto Manufacturer Social Media (December 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Snowycats was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This information should be put into existing articles (if it is notable/fits) - there is no need for a separate list of auto manufacturer social media accounts.

Snowycats (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Justanyone! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Snowycats (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Snowycats

Hello, Justanyone. You have new messages at Snowycats's talk page.
Message added 18:12, 24 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Snowycats (talk) 18:12, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Auto Manufacturer Social Media concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Auto Manufacturer Social Media, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Auto Manufacturer Social Media

Hello, Justanyone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Auto Manufacturer Social Media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Auto Manufacturer Social Media

Hello, Justanyone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Auto Manufacturer Social Media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]