Talk:Berliner (format)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The Christian Science Monitor has been using the berliner format much longer than the J&C cited in the article, anyone know how long though? —Preceding unsigned comment added by FozzyMaple (talk • contribs) 20:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Renamed from "Berliner (newspaper)" to avoid confusion with the Berliner newspaper. -- Picapica 13:44, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Why's the format called that, if the Berliner newspaper doesn't use it? --Oolong 11:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
- I've added an explanation (and the reference I got it from) to the article - basically, it's "Berliner" as in "Berlin" (like Parisien or Mancunian or whatever) and dates way back before the First World War. - IMSoP 22:38, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
Berliner format
[edit]Does anyone know the actual beginning date of this format?--84.152.187.226 15:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)gete
The place of origin is then, Berlin? I would love to know the specifics about the origins of the format! 86.56.152.251 19:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Half-berliner?
[edit]http://www.editorsweblog.org/print_newspapers/2007/04/uk_guardian_weekly_to_switch_to_smaller.php - not sure whether this is the same as "Compact" Snori 19:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
The Guardian in images
[edit]Confusingly, the two pics illustrating and comparing the Berliner format show The Guardian as an example of both a broadsheet and Berliner newspaper. This isn't actually incorrect (the paper was redesigned and changed format a few years ago) but is without explanation and will be puzzling to anyone unfamiliar with UK newspapers. A new image with a different broadsheet example would be clearer for most readers. --Ef80 (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
File:NewspaperSizes200508.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:NewspaperSizes200508.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC) |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)