User talk:Hammersfan

Hello Hammersfan, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Wikipedia:Help desk or (if you want a broader audience) the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the community portal.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp as well.
Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.
The Tutorial is a great way to learn the basics in a more perspicuous fashion.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 00:33, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hrtlogosh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hrtlogosh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oldspanishcolours.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Oldspanishcolours.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Falkland 10p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 10p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Falkland 1p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 1p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Falkland 20p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 20p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Falkland 2p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 2p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Falkland 50p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 50p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Falkland 5p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 5p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Falkland £1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland £1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Falkland £2.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland £2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Openallhours&porridge.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Openallhours&porridge.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HMAS jervis bay crest.gif

Thanks for uploading File:HMAS jervis bay crest.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey 10p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 10p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey 1p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 1p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey 20p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 20p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey 2p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 2p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey 50p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 50p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey 5p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 5p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey £1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey £1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey £2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey £2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Irish 3rd Battalion.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Irish 3rd Battalion.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Irishguardshighlanders.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Irishguardshighlanders.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NORFORCE cap badge.gif

Thanks for uploading File:NORFORCE cap badge.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Queen Mother's Funeral Procession.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Queen Mother's Funeral Procession.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Rnswr badge.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rnswr badge.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mønobi 02:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Rnzir.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rnzir.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mønobi 02:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Tworonnies.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tworonnies.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Royal Yeomanry cap badge.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Yeomanry cap badge.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Queen's_truncheon.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Queen's truncheon.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stagecoach Island line.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stagecoach Island line.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:QDG Cap Badge.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:QDG Cap Badge.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Qrlcapbadge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Qrlcapbadge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RNSWL cap badge.gif

Thanks for uploading File:RNSWL cap badge.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RGR.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:RGR.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rnswr badge.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Rnswr badge.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St helena10p.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:St helena10p.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St helena1p.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:St helena1p.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St helena20p.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:St helena20p.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St helena2p.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:St helena2p.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St helena50p.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:St helena50p.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St helena5p.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:St helena5p.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St helena£1.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:St helena£1.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St helena£2.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:St helena£2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Argh!

Please don't do "redirect and paste" moves like you did at London Waterloo to London Waterloo station – this really messes up the page histories, since the article text is now seperated from the people who wrote it. I've reverted the changes and moved the page properly. Shimgray | talk | 00:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Hi, I have noticed that you have made amendments to a number of railway articles today. As you did not mark them as being minor edits, and left no edit summary it had been a real job to ascertain what changes you have made.

Please could you be so kind as to give an edit summary, no matter how brief, in the future, stating what you have altered. If the changes are slight, and unlikely to cause anyone any fuss, then please could you also tick the "minor edit" box too. Your consideration towards other editors will be much appreciated. Thank you.Olana North (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cameronians.gif

I have tagged File:Cameronians.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Australian AWD.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Australian AWD.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove fair use issues from image

Hammersfan, I see that you removed the fair use request from File:Cameronians.gif and File:Australian AWD.jpg. However, each of those images still requires a detailed fair-use rationale. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cameronians.gif

I have tagged File:Cameronians.gif as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

regarding File:Cameronians.gif

Wikipedia:RAT#Necessary components states what is required in a rationale. It also gives examples of how to show the information.--Rockfang (talk) 10:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Australian_AWD.jpg

I have tagged File:Australian AWD.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 10:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi. Please see File:Australian AWD.jpg and notice what I've done. Per our image policy you must add a detailed fair use rationale for each article an image is used in. I've done if for you, see here. In the future, please add these rationales to any images you upload, or they could, and probably will be deleted. For more information, see WP:FURG. Thanks Rjd0060 (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:2e est.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:2e est.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AMS.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:AMS.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:50p reverse.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:50p reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've put down some ideas to try to simplify the adding and updating of icons for the rail diagrams. Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#{{rail-interchange}} icons. —Sladen (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised fthe subject of the use of tram symbols at WP:RDT in order to gain consensus. Could I ask you to please use edit summaries, particularly when reverting changes, such as this. Thanks. Tivedshambo (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Class 487.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Class 487.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Midland Metro and Wolverhampton

Just to let you know, I've removed the Midland Metro "interchanges" at Wolverhampton from all the heavy rail lines you've added them in to today. The reason I've done this is because the High Level station is actually quite some way away from St George's Metro; it's probably a similar distance to that between Birmingham New Street and Snow Hill. It's really a case of both are in the city centre, but in no sense could you suggest that they were an interchange. Fingerpuppet (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frenchcolours.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Frenchcolours.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hmsintrepidandfearless.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hmsintrepidandfearless.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Life-Guards badge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Life-Guards badge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jersey £2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey £2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gib £2.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Gib £2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hrtlogosh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hrtlogosh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guernsey 10p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 10p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guernsey 1p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 1p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guernsey 20p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 20p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guernsey 2p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 2p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guernsey 50p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 50p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guernsey 5p.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 5p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guernsey £1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey £1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Guernsey £2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey £2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, please, please, please will you start using edit summaries when you make edits. Having looked at your contributions, I can see that you practiacally never use them, which for an experienced editor like you is really not acceptable. It's a real nuisance for other editors. Furthermore, you've been asked this repeatedly in the past, going back for years [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. The summaries don't have to be imaginative, just informative, for the sake of other editors (myself included), who want to tell what you've been up to without having to load every single page you've edited. I'm asking nicely, but don't say I didn't warn you if someone asks you less politely! Thanks, --RFBailey (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with RFBailey on this. You need to communicate more with other users, not only through edit summaries but also through talk pages. Your usage statistics show a high number of article edits, but relatively little on talk pages. By communicating more, you will earn more trust and respect from the community. If you tick the box marked Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary in the editing section of your preferences, you'll soon get into the habit of it. As RFBailey says, you don't have to put much – e.g. see this one! Tivedshambo (talk) 20:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:VSOE art lnk

A tag has been placed on Template:VSOE art lnk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:37, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cefcap117.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cefcap117.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hrtlogosh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hrtlogosh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nxea

please rename the whole atricle its annoying to find out some one has just done one bit half of them still say `one` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddy774 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Southern electric

Interesting! It wasn't like that 20 years ago! I got the Motive Power Recognition 3: EMU (dating from c.1985) and a couple of mid- to late-80s Ian Allan ABC right here! Would be unusual for acronyms to be written in smaller case? Even more so given that EPB is just another acronym and so would be an exception? best, Sunil060902 (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OH they forgot the MLV and GLV too! Sunil060902 (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And its not just Ian Allan publications, there's some by OPC, like 100 Years of Electric Traction, again dating from the 1980s. I would stick my neck out and suggest that since Wikipedia craves consistency, capitals should be used to correspond with EPB/GLV/MLV. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 12:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Occam's Razor would point against a wide variety of publications by different authors and publishing houses being inaccurate. At least I think! Also why should "Cep" be small case and "EPB" be capitals? Corridor Electropneumatic is just as much an acronym as Electropneumatic Brake. I think SEG have their wires crossed, but who knows? best, Sunil060902 (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the real clincher would be the rear quarter view, well close-up, of a southern carriage (any Pre-TOPS stock will do) showing the Class info/specs "sticker". Seen any online? I tried looking but can't find any. May need to scan my books just to illustrate the point, though would obviously break copyright. As always assume good faith, but that goes for both of us of course (reluctant to mail Seg, I mean SEG (LOL!!!) without pictorial evidence). best, Sunil060902 (talk) 14:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KSY.jpg

I have tagged File:KSY.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 03:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Tworonniesspecs.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tworonniesspecs.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Hrtlogosh.jpg

I have tagged File:Hrtlogosh.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hrtlogosh.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hrtlogosh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pennyreverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Pennyreverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Markofcain.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Markofcain.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Perth sydbridge.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Perth sydbridge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manx10p reverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manx10p reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manx1p reverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manx1p reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manx20p reverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manx20p reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manx2p reverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manx2p reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manx50p reverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manx50p reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manx5p reverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manx5p reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manx£1 reverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manx£1 reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manx£2 reverse.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Manx£2 reverse.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heathrow Connect

I've reverted your edits to this article. Heathrow Connect is not a company – it's a branded service of Heathrow Express Ltd, to which FGW have handed over part of their access rights to allow it to run. First Great Western (or First Group) don't own it, and I think using the "joint venture" description that appears in press releases is not helpful. --Mr Thant (talk) 15:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to start an argument and it was a bit hasty of me to revert your edit so quickly, and I apologise. But I think you've still got the wrong end of the stick regarding what Heathrow Connect is. They mean "joint venture" in the sense of a partnership (they operate the service together) rather than the more common sense of a company they set up and own together, which is why I think it's not a good idea to use those words in the article.

Anyway, I've put in a more nuanced description of the structure – my earlier description (including the one above) wasn't quite right. But still, "Heathrow Connect" is just a brand name and not a company or a TOC. --Mr Thant (talk) 01:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Piggymalone.JPG

I have tagged File:Piggymalone.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo 8

Hi. I notice that you're correcting links to the crew members of various Apollo-era and earlier spaceflights. However, in the case of Apollo 8, you replaced several paragraphs of prose (and several references) with a bulleted list. While several other spaceflight articles have such lists, this article was expanded during a Featured Article Review, so – if possible – I'd like to keep the prose and references in place. Can we discuss this? Thanks in advance, UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 23:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree, as I can't think of a way in which a list is better than a prose section that conveys the same information. The prose doesn't note previous spaceflights explicitly, so that can be added – but I think it might be better to convert the other spaceflight articles to prose in a similar fashion (or, at least, the ones in the Apollo program). Would that be better? UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 23:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I'm sold. However, if you get a chance, could you restore the reference (#2) that seems to be broken? I can't seem to figure out which one it is, but it's likely one of the ones removed from that section. Thanks again, UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 02:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I've got the references fixed. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 03:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thalys logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Thalys logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:2pennyreverse.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:2pennyreverse.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:50p reverse.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:50p reverse.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:10th Light Horse Regiment badge.gif

Thanks for uploading File:10th Light Horse Regiment badge.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Fair use rationale for Image:10th Light Horse Regiment badge.gif

Thanks for uploading File:10th Light Horse Regiment badge.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:12 RBC cap badge.gif

Thanks for uploading File:12 RBC cap badge.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:3rd4th Cavalry cap badge.gif

Thanks for uploading File:3rd4th Cavalry cap badge.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:9th12th cap badge.gif

Thanks for uploading File:9th12th cap badge.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for File:Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 13:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

W&S on Current UK TOCs template

That was embarrassing! Btline (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

London District (British Army)

Instead of reverting correct information go to the discussion of London district and discuss! --noclador (talk) 11:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coldstream Guards are at Windsor & Welsh Guards are at Wellington Barracks – you are correct; I mixed that up.
2RRF, not 2 MERCIAN – you're indeed correct: the change was January 08 – I got my info from the London District homepage – obviously the 2 RRF is much quicker with homepage updating than the London District...
incremental companies hold the traditions of the 2nd battalions, which are in suspended animation – as the 3 companies link to an article about it, we can leave it at this.
When will Cavalry Barracks close? If I remember right 16 Royal Artillery left the Royal Artillery Barracks in July 07 and the incremental companies and public duties line infantry battalion are supposed to move there this year. Do you know when the move will occur?
re: out of date: as postings to the London districts are (as far as I know) 3 years – so plenty of time the units can be in the article and 1 change a years won't be a problem.
re 3 CDO BDE – as it is now: any errors? Now it clearly differentiates between 3 CDO BDE and the Royal Marines as a whole and the Army units are in a different colour than the rest – any other changes you think that are needed?
next time ask me to change the graphic – I will do it! also I update the graphics constantly – so next time a unit in the London district changes I will update the graphic once more
more pressing questions: have a look at: commons:http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Military OrBat Graphics/UK I spend 3 days trying to piece together a complete OrBat of the British Army – but the homepages is absolutely confusing (especially regarding Logistics and TA). As you seem to be the best informed Wikipedian in all things British Army could you have a look at the graphics and check if and which units might be wrongly assigned? also: what units make up 104 Logistic Brigade? who commands 16 Air Assault Brig: Joint Helicopter Command, 3 Division or 5 Division??? thanks for any info on the British Army structure. --noclador (talk) 13:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks a lot man

User pages use a subpage structure (see Wikipedia:Subpages). The software only recognizes subpages as pages following a / in certain namespaces. (Which is why things like talk page archives are always /Archive_1, /Archive_2, etc.) Thus, your page wasn't in your user space, but was in fact floating in the user namespace. If you would like the pages restored, please let me know. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Future to Prospective

I can see your point of view, but wish to draw your attention to several points:

I implied on a few talk pages what I was going to do a good while before I made changed. Noone raised any issues at that point.
When I reddid the templates a while back (simplifying the names, including the switch to "Future," it was raised about Future could be bad as many of them are pipe dreams.
It would be fairly impossible for Glasgow Trains starting this year as train paths have been sorted for the WCML high intensity timetable. The company (and Network Rail) said that any proposals would have to wait until things have settled down. Furthermore, GT have yet to decide on a route (as far as I know)!
Virign's competition rule may rule out any GT until at least 2012.

Thanks, Btline (talk) 18:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

British Army

3 MERCIAN part of 12 Brigade: Are you sure? According to the entry here at British Army Infantry#Permanent Deployments 3 MERCIAN is supposed to be part of 7th Armoured Brigade – I based my graphic on the info there...
Support units directly attached to Brigade, not detached from Division: hmm,... I thought so too, but then I found this site http://www.army.mod.uk/1div/organisation/index.htm – according to it all support units are detached from the Division to the Brigades. The homepage of the 20th Armoured Brigades indicates too, that all support units are not part of the Brigade http://www.army.mod.uk/20bde/units.htm Could you please clarify this issue?
Full unit names – fine with me, as long as there are no redirects necessary.
12th Mechanised Brigade: This can't be right: 1 Royal Anglian is part of 1 Mech Brigade; 3 Mercian (see point above) and the 2 Fusiliers is – as you said on April 30th: London districts "line infantry battalion has just changed – it is now 2RRF, not 2 MERCIAN". Therefore 2 Fusiliers can not be part of 12 Mech. Brig!

--noclador (talk) 15:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

damn confusing the British Army! :-) what I'm interested in is to create good graphic of the structures of Armies – I had to patch together the necessary info from a dozens sources (which way to often contradicted itself...) Let me now, when you have finished updating the Brigades articles and I will quickly update the graphics too with the changes you made. greetings, --noclador (talk) 16:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the Light role Btn. for 4 Mech??? 1 MERCIAN or 1 IG – in your list both are assigned to 1 Mech; As far as I know 1 Irish Guards is the Light role Btn. of 1 Mech and 1 Mercian the Light role Btn. of 4 Mech.
9/12th Lancers belongs to which unit? My info is that it belongs to 7 Armoured (http://www.army.mod.uk/7bde/7th_brigade_units_.htm) but you removed it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7th_Armoured_Brigade_%28United_Kingdom%29&diff=210347971&oldid=210339078 – could you please check to which unit it belongs? thanks (PS: I'm already updating the graphics :-)
2 PWRR & 2 LANCS are the 2 Btn. in Cyprus – question: under what command fall British Forces Cyprus? Or should we leave the British Forces Cyprus out of the graphic of the British Field Army?
11 Brigade: should we add this Brigade to the graphic? (would take about 10 minutes to do so) If yes: to which command or to which Division does it belong? (in that case I would remove the units of 11 Brigade from the other Brigades and move them back in 2010... if 11 Brig will really be disbanded then ;-) --noclador (talk) 18:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Railway stations

Nobody, including yourself, is to add or remove a railway station without discussing it first AND an agreement has been reached. If you have a problem, discuss it and wait until an agreement has been reached. If you continue not to do this, its is treated as vandalism and you will be reported to adminstration leading to a block on you editing. WL (talk) 17:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've put it up for vote. If you make a personal attack against me again, I will report you to administration. WL (talk) 16:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprise

If you wish to be picky, the class 111 is not a DEMU either, neither are the carriages powered, so why are they listed in this section? The Enterprise is half owned by NIR, is used by NIR so is part of the fleet. On occassion, the class 111 has been used on the Dublin run and 8112 is actually stationed in Dublin for long periods of time. So I disagree that the Enterprise shouldn't be listed on this page as well. Jimmy1109 (talk) 12:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Queen's bodyguard.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Queen's bodyguard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? —Remember the dot ^(talk) 17:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

~~Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blues and royals badge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Blues and royals badge.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oldguardnewguard.jpg

Hi what is the original source for these images?Geni 10:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Class 139.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Class 139.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Overground roundel.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Overground roundel.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great Britain at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Was there a reason why you removed the Swimming section? -- Ratarsed (talk) 09:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the process of moving it to "Aquatics" so that diving and synchro swimming can be included. Hammersfan 17/07/08, 10.56 BST

That makes sense -- whilst hindsight is a wonderful tool, it might be helpful to have made a note in the Edit summary to explain why you'd removed it, as I almost reverted it as suspected vandalism (it's only when I looked at your previous edits to the page that it became apparent that it was highly unlikely to be malicious). If you're interested, there is a preference you can set to prompt when entering a blank edit summary. -- Ratarsed (talk) 10:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ScotlandPolice.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ScotlandPolice.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - tholly ^--Turnip-- 13:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:ScotlandPolice.PNG

A tag has been placed on File:ScotlandPolice.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:ScotlandPolice.PNG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – tholly ^--Turnip-- 08:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:WalesPolice.png

File:WalesPolice.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:WalesPolice.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:WalesPolice.png]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aquatics at Great Britain at the 2008 Summer Olympics

I have resplit the section for now to be in line with other nations pages if the discussion here decides otherwise we can edit all nations pages to be the same. Basement12 (talk) 17:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bgcolors for medallists on Great Britain at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Please stop reverting these edits. A discussion is underway here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics and User:Basement12/Format for Nations at the Summer Olympics Articles where it has been decided:

The names of athletes who won medals should be bolded in results tables.
No background colour in the athletes row is necessary.
A Image:Gold medal icon.svg (), Image:Silver medal icon.svg () or Image:Bronze medal icon.svg () icon should be placed either in the final rank column or beneath the final result if no seperate column exists.

I shall shortly be reverting your reverts. Yboy83 (talk) 11:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read the edit history of the article – there is a link to the discussion and decisions being made in my edit summaries! The reason the whole article hasn't been done is that I'm currently working my way through it, section by section. Yboy83 (talk) 12:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fiji cap badge.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Fiji cap badge.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Leroyal22regiment.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Navy colours.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Navy colours.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Crown Colony flag 1946

re: File:Singapore Crown Colony flag 1946.PNG Nice work. I cannot vouch for the likeness as I have never before scene the flag, but it matches what is described in Britannica.

ThanX, NevilleDNZ (talk) 12:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jersey 50p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 50p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 20:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SRR.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SRR.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RPIR.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RPIR.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 14:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RAFRegtbadge.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:RAFRegtbadge.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rgbw.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Rgbw.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly message

Need help with the proper licensing, tagging and reasons/rationale for fair use in them image uploads of yours? Fret not, just drop me a note anytime and I'll help. Unlike some of them speedy bastards here who keep speedy other people's upload of images just because of poorly reasoned or licensed tag, I'll help you if you just let me know which are the one(s) in dispute, right? Cheers~! ...Dave1185 (talk) 13:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:WSF.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WSF.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Falkland 10p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 10p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Falkland 1p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 1p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Falkland 20p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 20p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Falkland 2p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 2p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Falkland 50p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 50p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Falkland 5p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland 5p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Falkland £1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland £1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Falkland £2.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Falkland £2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jersey 10p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 10p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jersey 1p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 1p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jersey 20p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 20p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jersey 2p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 2p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jersey 5p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey 5p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jersey £1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey £1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jersey £2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jersey £2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Irish 3rd Battalion.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Irish 3rd Battalion.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Irishguardshighlanders.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Irishguardshighlanders.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NORFORCE cap badge.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NORFORCE cap badge.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Queen Mother's Funeral Procession.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Queen Mother's Funeral Procession.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rnswr badge.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rnswr badge.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rnzir.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rnzir.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RPIR.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RPIR.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:RPIR.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:RPIR.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:RN&RAF colours.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:RN&RAF colours.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RN&RAF colours.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RN&RAF colours.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:RGBWback.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:RGBWback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RGBWback.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RGBWback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Navy colours.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Navy colours.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Leroyal22regiment.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Leroyal22regiment.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Fiji cap badge.PNG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Fiji cap badge.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fiji cap badge.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fiji cap badge.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:9th12th cap badge.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:9th12th cap badge.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:3rd4th Cavalry cap badge.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:3rd4th Cavalry cap badge.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:12 RBC cap badge.gif

~~Image Copyright problem~~
Thanks for uploading File:12 RBC cap badge.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:10th Light Horse Regiment badge.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:10th Light Horse Regiment badge.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manx£2 reverse.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Manx£2 reverse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manx£1 reverse.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Manx£1 reverse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manx5p reverse.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Manx5p reverse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manx50p reverse.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Manx50p reverse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manx2p reverse.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Manx2p reverse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manx20p reverse.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Manx20p reverse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manx1p reverse.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Manx1p reverse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manx10p reverse.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Manx10p reverse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:KSY.jpg

~~Image Copyright problem~~
Thanks for uploading File:KSY.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:Guernsey £2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey £2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Guernsey £1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey £1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Guernsey 5p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 5p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Guernsey 50p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 50p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Guernsey 2p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 2p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Guernsey 20p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 20p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Guernsey 1p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 1p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Guernsey 10p.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guernsey 10p.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Queen Mother's Funeral Procession.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Queen Mother's Funeral Procession.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Irishguardshighlanders.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Irishguardshighlanders.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:RN&RAF_colours.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:RN&RAF colours.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:RGBWback.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:RGBWback.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Navy_colours.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Navy colours.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Leroyal22regiment.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

It was because I wasn't sure of there status that they were listed on WP:PUI. If you can justify thier inclusion under fair use terms, comment in that PUI discussion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Former police forces of Ireland

A tag has been placed on Template:Former police forces of Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --ninety:one 20:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC) ninety:one 20:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:British police maps

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:British police maps, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:British police maps has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:British police maps, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:YeomanoftheGuard_badge.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:YeomanoftheGuard badge.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 13:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ldn Ovrgrd Train Internal.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Ldn Ovrgrd Train Internal.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:NS Hispeed.PNG

Hi there. Could you upload this file to commons? Migdejong (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Infantry Shield.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Infantry Shield.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 questions

Hi Hammersfan

Happy new year too you – let's begin it with some more work on the British Army :-) first question: have there been any OrBat changes lately? If yes: which? (as I'm at the PC today I'm ready to update the Field and Home Army graphics if necessary). second question: would you mind if I redraw your image File:RACrecruiting.jpg with a higher/clearer resolution? I would like to but will only do it if it is ok with you. thanks and all the best, --noclador (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the graphics and created a single map with all the recruiting areas of the RAC:

I have a version 2 times as big as this one – I can upload that if you think it might be better; also if you have any suggestions how to improve the graphic just let me know. Furthermore: isn't the British infantry also recruited locally? if indeed that is so – I'm ready to create a graphic for the infantry too. --noclador (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, --noclador (talk) 03:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Srilankaarmy.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Srilankaarmy.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 08:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please provide edit summaries more often. This recent edit for example leaves me puzzled as to why you made the change. Explaining what you're doing and why you're doing it more often would be helpful. Cheers. Adambro (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out that I've asked you about this previously, as have a number of others. Is there a reason why you don't do so? Adambro (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horseguardssentry.jpg

Hello Hammersfan File:Horseguardssentry.jpg has been transfered to Commons as Commons:File:Horseguardssentry.jpg, since you licensed it under PD nothing changes but for the fact that it can be used easily by our sister projects, images loaded to Commons can be used in exactly the same way as local uploads. If you are happy to continue making your future images available under a PD license, it is worth considering to do so to Commons, SUL means that you probably already have an account there and the process is much the same as it is here.KTo288 (talk) 00:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSicon tTurmBHFo.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:BSicon tTurmBHFo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. axp_de ^Hello! 16:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welshleprechaun and the Template dispute

Hello, following an interaction I have had with Welshleprechaun that culminated in this series of messages complaining about me on Wikiquette Alerts I was asked if I could have a word with you about your two messages to Welshleprechaun. Just a word in your ear: it might be best to tone down the rhetoric so that you don't talk about an editor's intentions in future. It might help prevent any later drama from blowing up. By all means argue strongly, but don't make remarks aimed at an editor, instead concentrate on making your points impersonally wherever possible. Thanks. DDStretch (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Grenadier-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Grenadier-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

British Rail DMU's

Thanks for supplying clarification for the issue of class 222/1s in the British Rail Class 222 article (see talk)

However – not thanks for undoing the work I did to some of the other DMU articles – I will change those back. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Rolling stock pages for more details.

You're edits looked like reverts, but if I have undone any additional changes you have made I apologise. Please let me know, and I can endevour to help you re-add any supplimentary material you have if you wish.

The changes to the organisation of the articles were in general well received for the reasons given at the page I linked above. Thanks.FengRail (talk) 20:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HST/ Classes 253/254 etc

Hello again – the reason I merged these articles was that they cover exactly the same topic.

Do you think that the main page should be at Class 253/254 etc ? I'm open to suggestions and I'm sure other editors will be. if so please bring this up on the talk page. (Can I suggest the InterCity 125 talk page?

I can assure you that I didn't remove any information when merging the two articles.

Would you object if I made the Class 253etc page a redirect page again? Given that no information would be lost, and that – if neccessary the article title could be changed??FengRail (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello, me again. One last thing – you marked the edits you made as 'minor' – hopefully you will appreciate that reverting a lot of work done (much of it done by me) is usually not considered minor. Usually I forget to mark the edits either way.FengRail (talk) 22:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Class 253 etc

(Note – the Class 43 refers to the engine – not the train, and so would not be redirected)

I reinserted a suggestion for a merge into InterCity 125.

My reasoning is that the two articles, no matter how differently titled describe the same thing – Its possible that the BR Class 253 etc may be a better title. And that the "InterCity 125" title is misleading (being in one sense a service desciption as you say)- nevertheless the term "InteCity 125" is fairly well understood to mean the same as "Class 253 etc".

Personally I'd have no objection to the main article being at "BR Class 253 etc", but please note that model manufacturers, the press, and the Encyclopedia Britannica use the term "InterCity 125", "HST" to mean the same thing – the "BR Class 253"

Would you prefer the main article at the "BR Class 253.." page, or what?

Please insert your suggestion on the talk page of the article for merging.

FengRail (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Class 222

You keep reinserting this reference:

Reading the reference it says the Class 221 are interoperable with class 220. It doesn't say the Class 222 are not operable.

You say in youe edit summaries that the text has 'mysteriously changed' – the reason it has changed is that the references do not support the text. I've added two further "fact" tags for the information needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FengRail (talk • contribs) 14:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 14:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Class 373

Sorry about that spurious reflist – I put it in to confirm the format of the ref I'd added in the preview and forgot to remove it again. Thanks for cleaning up after me! -- Timberframe (talk) 12:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Vigil1936.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vigil1936.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —teb728 t c 21:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vigil1936.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vigil1936.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —teb728 t c 20:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Vigil2002.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vigil2002.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —teb728 t c 20:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

12th/16th Hunter River Lancers

Hello Hammsfan, this is just a friendly 'please explain'. Can you please explain why you have changed the command structure field in the infobox on 12th/16th Hunter River Lancers from 8th Brigade, 2nd Division to Royal Australian Armoured Corps?

I do not believe that this change is correct. The RAAC is not a command structure, while 8 Bde, 2 Div is. Additionally the unit itself does not belong the RAAC, but some of its members do. Within the Australian Army a Corps is responsible for setting standards for training personnel for specific jobs, not for commanding units, as such a unit does not belong to a Corps, but some of its members i.e. drivers, officers, etc. do. Other members of the unit, e.g. clerks, cooks, etc. belong to different Corps, but to the same unit.

Additionally, when making a change like this I feel that you should also leave an edit summary rather than simply labelling it as a minor edit.

Also, why did you remove the flag icon? Is this not correct? It seems in keeping with most of the other unit articles on wiki, unless there is some MOS requirement I don't know about (which is possible as the MOS seems harder to make sense of than the Australian Army's Pay and Conditions Manual).

Can you please discuss why you have made the changes you have? — AustralianRupert (talk) 01:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I've had a look at a few of the other similar units, e.g. 10th Light Horse Regiment (Australia), 1st/15th Royal New South Wales Lancers and they also seem to include RAAC in the command structure field in the infobox. Some infantry units have the RAINF (e.g. 2nd/17th Battalion, Royal New South Wales Regiment) while others use Bde and Div, e.g. 1st/19th Battalion, Royal New South Wales Regiment).

My personal opinion is as above, that command structure should actually represent what unit the subject unit is subordinate to, not what Corps the majority of its members belong to. However, wikipedia is all about concensus so I'm happy to stick with whatever concensus has been established. Is there a policy that states what should go in this field, do you know? — AustralianRupert (talk) 03:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(per response on my talk page) Okay, I think that makes sense, although technically it is a misunderstanding of the conceptual differences in what a 'regiment' actually is, i.e. in armoured units a regiment means the same as infantry battalion, whereas an infantry regiment is more a ceremonial creation rather than a command unit. But I'm not one to buck convention, so I will try to follow that guidance. Thanks for the explaination. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 07:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bedford – Sevenoaks

Could you explain to me why you removed the Bedford-Sevenoaks services that I put in. Accrording to National Rail First Capital Connect and Southeastern operate this service jointley. PLease reply on my talk page explaing why you did this. The IP below that I signed with is my is Holiday ip please reply at talk). Thanks

86.132.231.112 (talk) 09:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg

File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Leroyal22regiment.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saugeais flag.gif

You may be interested in the above discussion on Wikimedia Commons, as you uploaded the original file. J Milburn (talk) 18:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:UNLINKDATES

Thank you for your many edits on various railway related articles. I frequently find myself delinking the dates after new content has been added. Could I (politely) draw your attention to MOS:UNLINKDATES (dates and years should not be linked). Once again, thank you for continuing to add new content. —Sladen (talk) 09:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Clapham Junction lines

I see your rationale for making the "Eurostar" link pink and I do not propose to revert , but

(1) does pink mean "gone" or does it mean "in some way out of use"?
(2) I peer up the viaduct approach tracks when going to Wloo and it has seemed to me that the rails are not all out-of-use rusty. Is there any record of its use or not being used, even for stock movements, since St P took over?--SilasW (talk) 13:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. A thought to follow is: what is the state of the line from West London Ext. Jn. to Latchmere Jn for W'loo, relaid expressly for Eurostar to access N Pole?--SilasW (talk) 09:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not converted to "Pink means 'not in regular service use', as opposed to 'now never used' " (though I mutter that in "Eppur si muove" style) but I notice that a fan trip via the Linford Street flyover is scheduled for 11 Oct.--SilasW (talk) 10:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chechen Republic of Ichkeria national football team

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chechen Republic of Ichkeria national football team, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chechen Republic of Ichkeria national football team. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Blacklake (talk) 10:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there is anything that the closing administrator needs to know, then make a note of it on the discussion page. If the page has been vandalised, then say so. If you doubt a contributors reasons for nominations then say so (but remember WP:AGF and WP:NPI). I have no interest in the article and have no opinion about it, I was merely categorising the deletion disucssion so that people who are interested can find it. Thryduulf (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

West papuan national football team

Hi there. Could you please promptly complete or remove you recent nomination of this article for deletion. thanks. --Merbabu (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article was recreated 9 months later. My understanding is that afd's are not necessarily permanent – unless agreed that they are permanent, articles can be re-created. I suggest you speak to an administrator for advice as currently, your afd tag just links to the previous archived (ie, closed) discussion (from 2007?). I don't know the afd process that well, but I believe you need to create a new nomination – not just link to the closed previous one until you sort it out. In the meantime, i will remove the current tag. Let me know if you need any other help. Why not talk to User:Mailer diablo? He closed the debate as delete in 2007 and appears to be still active on wikipedia. cheers--Merbabu (talk) 22:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

West Papua national football team AfD

I have reverted your edits to this AfD; you can't simply edit a closed AfD, you need to actually open up an entirely new nomination. Please read WP:AFD for instructions on how to properly go about opening AfDs, as you have also made many errors in your one on the South Moluccas national football team. Giant Snowman 16:18, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged it for speedy deletion as an article which was previously deleted being recreated. If that is declined, then simply follow the step-by-step guide at WP:AFD on how to open second nominations. Giant Snowman 16:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy was declined, so you'd better take it to WP:AFD . Cheers, Giant Snowman 19:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Infantry.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Infantry.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Please? –Signalhead ^< T > 21:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HMKG.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HMKG.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 01:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

President's Own Guard Regiment

Would you mind adding the sources you used to write this article? Cheers and best wishes for Christmas, Buckshot06 (talk) 05:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Class 380.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Class 380.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:12 RBC cap badge.gif

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

St Pancras railway station]]

I have just reviewed the St Pancras station article for which you are one of the top five editors. This article is currently rated as a B class article, but would, with a little work to add a few citations where I have marked, almost certainly pass a Good Article Review if nominated. I have started a discussion at Talk:St Pancras railway station#Good Article – almost. --DavidCane (talk) 01:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:2 14qmi.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2 14qmi.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 08:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

5/7RAR Unit Colour Patch

Howdy. I noticed that the UCP for 5/7RAR no longer displays on the article page due to the September 2008 image loss bug. As you uploaded it originally is there any chance you still have the file and could upload it again? Cheers. Anotherclown (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Royalgibraltarregiment.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royalgibraltarregiment.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to discuss recent changes

Hello, Hammersfan. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AustralianRupert (talk) 12:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hammersfan. Please refer to this conversation before continuing to make changes regarding command structure of Australian Army units. I don't want to get into an edit war over this, but your position is not correct in my opinion. Despite the fact that "regiment" appears in their names, a units such as 3/9 SAMR are operational not ceremonial in the Australian Army hence their command relationship is their brigade and division, not their Corps. Corps in the Australian Army have no command function and to add them to infobox in that field is wrong. I don't believe that precedent with other Commonwealth "regiments" is correct in this case, as the Australian Army uses the term much differently to the British. Regiment in the case of say 1 Armoured Regiment is using the term as in "battalion". I have to admit to being a bit concerned about you continuing to make changes when I have quite clearly asked you to talk about it first. As such, I will be reverting your changes for lack of concensus and being incorrect. Please see the discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Use of flag icons and command structure parameter in infoboxes. I am more than happy to discuss and come to consensus about the matter, even if ultimately the project decides your position is correct, so please visit the discussion and provide your opinion. — AustralianRupert (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:1st armoured regiment.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:1st armoured regiment.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:PPCLI.JPG

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:4-19 Light Horse Cap Badge.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:4-19 Light Horse Cap Badge.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Enterprise (train service).PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enterprise (train service).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grand Union logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grand Union logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for assistance for 27th Battalion (Australia)

Hello Hammersfan,

I am chasing some references for the 27th Battalion (Australia) article and note that you are one of the main contributors to the Royal South Australia Regiment article. Of course the 27th Battalion was part of the RSAR after the war before it became the 10th/27th Battalion. Particularly I note that in the RSAR article you wrote:

"On 1 July 1965, the Regiment was reformed as 2 battalions, taking their names from the battalions that formed the regiment: The 10th and 27th."

What reference did you use for this? If it is still available we could use that on the 27th Battalion article also. Thanks in advance. Anotherclown (talk) 15:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TTC streetcar routes

You recently added succession boxes to stations for some of the TTC streetcar routes. The direction of your additions run in the opposite direction to the subway lines and the normal convention of west=left and east=right. How far are you going to go with this? Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:11, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop!!! Those are NOT stations – you are only recreating non notable streetcar stops, which have been previously deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/College Street (TTC) – Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above comment asking you to stop. Toronto has close to ten-thousand (10,000) bus stops many of which are streetcar stops... this does not make them "stations" and does not make them notable enough to have their own articles. The route articles for each streetcar route have some information about stops along the way, but for people looking to find out every single stop along a particular route ttc.ca would be a natural first choice... not a series of mismashed articles on Wikipedia

eja2k 22:54, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are really making a mess of this. You have never contributed to TTC articles until a couple of days ago. You have some of the routes running east-west and others west-east. You are creating Wikilinks to previously deleted streetcar stops and you are just making some of it up. I have tried to help, by fixing some problems in templates – but you have just ignored me. Good luck! Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop! Secondarywaltz is right, if you have any suggestions for improvements on the TTC series of articles please discuss them first on the Toronto Transit Commission talk page, the Streetcar system talk page and the Subway and RT talk page. Many of the things you are doing have been previously discussed there. There are 4 or 5 primary editors ( Johnny Au, Secondarywaltz, Ground Zero... and to an extent myself) who have established consensus about how these articles should go moving forward and are generally on the same page as far as how these articles are progressing. Please read up on Wikipedia policies regarding creating articles, and check the talk page for some helpful hints about how to proceed as to avoid petty conflicts and revert wars.

eja2k 07:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

York (TTC)

A tag has been placed on York (TTC) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CDN GDS Cap Badge.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CDN GDS Cap Badge.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please archive

Important: This talk page is becoming very long. Please consider archiving.

Fair use rationale for File:Coldstream-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Coldstream-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dave Tucker.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dave Tucker.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RTR cap badge symbol

I wish to use this symbol on a translation for the Royal Tank Regiment. The picture seems to be copyrighted, however, There is the Commonwealth copyright law stating that government pictures\symbols made prior to 1957 are made free to use for public use (Crown copyright). Would you please check the copyright status of this picture again and perhaps change it. The picture in question is this File:RTR cap badge.gif. Whatever the case, my intended use for this symbol is only on a translation of the same value on the RTR. Jakednb (talk) 15:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I have uploaded the image to Wikimedia commons under you name and the PD-UKgov license so it can be used by other Wikipedia languages. Jakednb (talk) 01:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Guardmounting.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Guardmounting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits again

Hello Hammersfan,

PLEASE be aware that you should not mark changes, other than minor spelling, format or grammatical changes, as minor edits. As an example, your edits of 11th and 13th October to List of men's national association football teams were not minor edits – they added a significant new section. Editors who patrol pages on their watchlist will often miss or overlook edits marked as minor. I note that this is not the first time that you have been made aware of this; please become familiar with the practice. Cheers Pretty Green (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Midland Main Line1

Template:Midland Main Line1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 00:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:JNBCregiment.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:JNBCregiment.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Connexxion lines

Template:Connexxion lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 16:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Railtour insert

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Railtour start

Template:Railtour start has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste move of Belfast Central railway station

Hi Hammersfan, just a quick heads up about the move you made last March from Belfast Central Station to Belfast Central railway station. While this was probably a good move, the method you used (known as a "cut and paste move"), is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you! — Amakuru (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vsoetime prim

Template:Vsoetime prim has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Royal Gurkha Rifles

Template:Royal Gurkha Rifles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Royal Marines

Template:Royal Marines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Buran space shuttle

Hi Hammersfan, back in 2007 you uploaded a file, File:Space shuttle USSR.jpg, but did not specify a source or an author. Do you remember where you got the image from, and why you gave it a generic U.S. Gov't license template? Thanks. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:IFU Teams

Template:IFU Teams has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Stu.W UK (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NF-Board teams

Template:NF-Board teams has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Stu.W UK (talk) 22:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:NIR C4K.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NIR C4K.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Puerto rico national sport flag.PNG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Puerto rico national sport flag.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paras.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paras.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield Station/Sheffield Hallam University tram stop

Hi. I noticed that you recently created Sheffield Station/Sheffield Hallam University tram stop. All Sheffield supertram stop articles were previously deleted—you can read the deletion discussion here. Because of this I suggest that you start a discussion at Talk:Supertram (Sheffield) before creating any more of these articles, to see if there is consensus to reverse the previous decision to delete. Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 13:34, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given the access problems I doubt that this stop is actually used by many people trying to get to SHU. Previous consensus was that the individual tram stops are not notable and that the coverage of stop design in the main supertram article along with the tramstop list were sufficient. I think that the Sheffield station article should have a section on transport links that covered the supertram stop and the Sheffield Interchange (and possibly parking etc.). As you say that you are ambivalent about the article I am planning to PROD it.—Jeremy (talk) 21:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:R IRISH.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:R IRISH.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:41, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R IRISH.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R IRISH.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Staffordshire Regt.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Staffordshire Regt.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. B (talk) 03:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oldguardnewguard.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oldguardnewguard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VSOE train.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VSOE train.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bloor-Danforth Line Map

Any particular reason that you decided to replace the (SUBWAY) and (CLRV) icons on the diagram with non-intuitive coloured blobs (but left the (BUS1) ones intact? Useddenim (talk) 21:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zanzibar and CAF

Can you provide a current source which says that Zanzibar is a CAF associate? I cannot find any mention of this on the CAF or FIFA websites. --Pretty Green (talk) 08:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, scratch that, I have found one news story at FIFA! --Pretty Green (talk) 09:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool James Street

Hi, I've reverted this edit, because there's no way that I can reconcile it with either rail maps of the area or with Table 106 National Rail timetable, May 2011. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FUSILIERƧ

left|70px Hello Hammersfan. This is about your Royal Welch Fusiliers badge. I was going to turn this into a decent svg, but is the last letter on the badge reversed on purpose? If that is just a freak mistake, I will gladly correct this. Just let me know. Iago 2¹² 13:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:12 RBC cap badge.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:12 RBC cap badge.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:5-7RAR UCP.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:5-7RAR UCP.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:R IRISH TRF.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:R IRISH TRF.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:R GIB TRF.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:R GIB TRF.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:R ANGLIAN TRF.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:R ANGLIAN TRF.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eurotunnel Class 0001

Hello. Have you got a source for the numbering of the locomotives purchased by Eurotunnel in 2010, or is it an assumption?Oranjblud (talk) 21:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. When you recently edited Eurotunnel Calais Terminal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAN F-35.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RAN F-35.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BR Class 68

Is there a source for the numbering? - because without it the article would have to be deleted as speculation, as per previous attempts.Oranjblud (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about this – I couldn't find anything in the current issue of RAIL, and in the most recent edition of "Today's Railways" issue 126 June 2012 it states that DRS is having an employee competition to name a locomotive, and that a class number for the class has not been decided. I don't want another fiasco like happened with British Rail Class 70 (diesel) where the class number was given as 68 due to journalistic speculation.Oranjblud (talk) 14:26, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(reply) I'm talking about a source in "Today's Railways" which states the opposite of what you have stated – there is no mix up. I will nominated this page for deletion. WP:VERIFY should apply here. If you have sources you need to state them, preferably with issue and page numbers. The sources also need to be shown to be reliable – ie confirmed, and not just speculation by the magazine – given that this has happened before, and the "expected" class number didn't happen.Oranjblud (talk) 14:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't publish the references, then I would suggest working on the article in a sand-box until it is finished.Oranjblud (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't start playing silly buggers with the article – the template states clearly If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason.. I have a very recent source that states the number has not been assigned. The template does nothing unless the article is not fixed within a week. That's plenty of time. Not only are my concerns about accuracy legitimate, I have a verifyable source that states the exact opposite to what you claim.Oranjblud (talk) 15:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

I have proposed the article for deletion: there are a number of problems -

WP:CONTENT FORK – the article duplicates the Vossloh Eurolight article with no extra information except the name.
The name appears to be wrong. I know you say you have different info., but the source I gave was pretty (100%) clear that the class number has not been decided. This is a minor issue that will be eventually sorted out.

Some of the data in the infobox is unsourced – I have to assume that is is derived from that given for the "Euro" version – as far as I know the specs of the UK version have not yet been published.

There doesn't seem to be enough information about this specific version as yet to justify a separate article – I would suggest creating the article in a sandbox until there is sufficient extra info to justify a UK spin off article. In the long term this may happen, currently I don't think it is justified, based on available coverage I am aware of.Oranjblud (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Modern railways

Thank you for providing a clear reference. There is still an issue relating to duplication, as well as some unsourced data. I've commented on the deletion discussion about that.Oranjblud (talk) 22:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:R IRISH.PNG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:R IRISH.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchroCat (^ • @) 16:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RNSWL cap badge.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RNSWL cap badge.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:59, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:R IRISH.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:R IRISH.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 00:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Open All Hours & Porridge (Seven of One).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Open All Hours & Porridge (Seven of One).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Royal Wessex Rangers

Template:Royal Wessex Rangers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 12:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Coldstream-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Coldstream-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Welsh-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Welsh-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Royal Welch Fusiliers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Welch Fusiliers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olympic Park, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Handball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Prince's Company of Carabiniers.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Prince's Company of Carabiniers.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Air Corps (Ireland) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Garda

Ballina railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ballina

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Free kick, Dugout and Peter Nicholas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match

The article 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable football match

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:36, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1985 Wales vs Scotland football match until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 04:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Jordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flag query

Could you explain this please? Do you have a source which says that Kosovo's official flag was actually the UN flag? bobrayner (talk) 10:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jock Stein

Category:Jock Stein, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 02:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested assessment for 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match

Hello. I notice you requested a reassessment of 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match at WikiProject Football. The article, currently class B, has the highest possible rating awarded by a project. In order to get a higher rating, you need to visit Wikipedia:Featured article candidates and request such a rating there, following the instructions. Good luck! Cloudz 679 13:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Please see question at Wikipedia:Peer review/1985 Wales vs Scotland football match/archive1. Cheers. --Noleander (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-Dublin

Hi, I just came across the above to which you seem to have been a principal contributor.

It seems to me that the subject of the article may be a neologism. Do you have any source for the existence of a railway line by this name? I would be thinking about nominating for deletion otherwise, because a google search shows up little but other wiki sites and I can find no trace of such a line (as opposed to the DART proper) on the websites of Iarnród Éireann. Regards, ComhairleContaeThirnanOg (talk) 01:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jock Stein and Neville Southall.jpg.png

I'm afraid I have deleted the above image, as it was taken from a commercial source and was not the subject of explicit, sourced commentary. As such, it fails NFCC#3 (see the non-free content criteria), and, in any case, it probably failed NFCC#8, and met CSD#F7 (see the criteria for speedy deletion). Other images in the same article are extremely problematic; I worry that you are not judicious enough with the non-free images that you choose to upload. J Milburn (talk) 22:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiganbath.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wiganbath.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Spanish and Dutch royal families WC2010.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Spanish and Dutch royal families WC2010.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

I've reviewed 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match at Talk:1985 Wales vs Scotland football match/GA1. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1985 Wales vs Scotland football match, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malcolm Allen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbia and Montenegro national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (football) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Class 68

If you want to request a Deletion Review for your Class 68 article as the starting point for a new article, I would certainly support it. Zombie Aardvark (talk) 03:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Northern Line diagram

As far as I can tell, the only change you made (other than adding the symbol) was to widen the diagram and add excessive white space. Just æsthetics, or was there some other reason? Useddenim (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kings-Royal-Hussars cap badge.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Kings-Royal-Hussars cap badge.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for British Rail Class 68

An editor has asked for a deletion review of British Rail Class 68. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Zombie Aardvark (talk) 01:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Doctor Who (season 6) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Recorder and The Three Doctors

The Trial of a Time Lord (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Graham Williams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kings-Royal-Hussars cap badge.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Kings-Royal-Hussars cap badge.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK review Class 374

DYK nomination of British Rail Class 374

Hello! Your submission of British Rail Class 374 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Garyvines (talk) 14:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Doctor Who (season 10) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Three Doctors

Doctor Who (season 15) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Invisible Enemy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for British Rail Class 374

On 29 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British Rail Class 374, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Class 374 is the first high speed train type purchased by a part owned French rail company not to be based on the TGV? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British Rail Class 374. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awards lists in play articles

Based on your past editing activity, you may want to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Theatre#Award enumeration.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:08, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent Wales in Premier League edits suggest you may be interested in reading and/or commenting on this

Your recent 'Wales in Premier League' edits suggest you may be interested in reading and/or commenting on this. Tlhslobus (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And your edit note debate with PJ which lead to this discussion, which in turn lead to this change, which can be seen at Premier League among other articles. Your opinions would be welcome. Kevin McE (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited General Dynamics F-111K, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marconi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

General Dynamics F-111K

Great work with this article! It provides a good account of this F-111 variant. Nick-D (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The new McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service article is also excellent. Nick-D (talk) 10:44, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to second Nick's congratulations on F-4 in UK service; do you have plans for any other similar articles? Buckshot06 (talk) 22:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Suchet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] ([[Archbishop of Westminster]]), [[Barry Morgan]] ([[Archbishop of Wales]]), [[David Ford]] ([[Regius Professor of Divinity]] at [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge]], [[Joel Edwards]] (

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doctor Who (season 26), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Finish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service

Hello! Your submission of McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Prioryman (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rail

Hi Hammers fan. I am intending on a more descriptive, less misleading classification for Britain's railways. Please give your thoughts as to how we can improve the current classification at the railways template where you have been a contributor. Adam37 (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A topic in Wikiproject Football about the Israel FIFA issue

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#FIFA records of Israel and false information given by another user, Please read.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 15:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Series Cricket tour of the West Indies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mick Malone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Australian cricket team in West Indies in 1977–78 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Saint George's, Georgetown and Wayne Clark

World Series Cricket Tour of New Zealand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mick Malone

World Series Cricket tour of the West Indies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Georgetown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Current Brigades of the British Army

Category:Current Brigades of the British Army, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Trek: The Q Continuum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Q2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of men's national association football teams

I'm happy to discuss adding geographical notes to this article, but I don't personally see value in this. It also seems odd to add them to Suriname/Guyana, but not to Australia and Cyprus. There is also the issue of 'transcontinental' nations such as Egypt, Russia, France, Turkey. For this reason, I'd argue that we're better without the notes – the article is not about the geography of these teams.

Also, please do not mark content changes as minor. It makes it much harder for other editors to check how a page is being edited. I see that numerous editors have asked you about this before. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 12:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Esmond Knight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Leach

List of law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ministry of Defence

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doctor Who (2013 specials), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Eleventh Hour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:12, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Third Doctor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antagonism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Night of the doctor regeneration.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Night of the doctor regeneration.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 21:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eighth Doctor Royal Mail Stamp.jpg

If the infobox image is deleted, shall this image be deleted, as well? And replaced by free image of the actor? --George Ho (talk) 05:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cityheart.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cityheart.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:An Garda Síochána flag.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:An Garda Síochána flag.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:09, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eighth Doctor Royal Mail Stamp.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eighth Doctor Royal Mail Stamp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cefcap117.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Cefcap117.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

I think the images you've added to the King George V class article are worthwhile. However, I think the addition of these images should not be flagged as a minor edit. --Yaush (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kosovo national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mitrovica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TTR cap badge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TTR cap badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: archiving your talk page

With more than 350 sections on your talk page it is much less useful than could be possible. I suggest archiving your talk page which can be done in a fully automatic manner, should you choose. It appears that this was suggested by some other editor approximately 3 1/2 years ago. You did not respond at the time, so it is unclear if you did not see that, or if it is your choice not to archive. From the red-links at the top of the page it appears that at some point in the past you did have some archives but chose to delete them.

The page Help:Archiving a talk page has quite a bit of information about archiving, including some examples which you could just cut and paste into the top of this page. Alternately, if you would like some help setting up the archives, I am willing to provide it. — Makyen (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Type 22 frigate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oerlikon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Leander-class cruiser (1931) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blyth

Town-class cruiser (1936) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blyth

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Canadianarmy.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Canadianarmy.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Template:2014 Major League Soccer season table page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kanimbla and Manoora scrapping

Thanks for adding the list of ships to the Kanimbla-class landing platform amphibious article. In the table, you mention that Kanimbla was scrapped in New Orleans in 2013, and Manoora in the same location in 2014. Do you have a source that specifies this, and if so, could you add the information to the individual ship articles? Thanks in advance! -- saberwyn 11:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A belated thank you for providing sources. I've copied the info across to the individual ship articles. -- saberwyn 09:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Defence Helicopter Flying School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Air Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scots-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scots-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

USS Enterprise (1775) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to USS Enterprise

USS Enterprise (1799) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to USS Enterprise

USS Enterprise (1831) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to USS Enterprise

USS Enterprise (1874) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to USS Enterprise

USS Enterprise (CV-6) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to USS Enterprise

USS Enterprise (CVN-65) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to USS Enterprise

USS Enterprise (CVN-80) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to USS Enterprise

USS Enterprise (SP-790) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to USS Enterprise

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa explosion

[7] Please don't remove this information without a discussion first on the article talk page. It's customary in accident/disaster articles to this kind of information in the infobox. This information has been in that infobox since the article was drafted years ago and it passed the FA nomination with it. Cla68 (talk) 22:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Sea Orbit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia-class cruiser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AEGIS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iowa-class battleship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benchmark. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited USS Langley (CV-1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World War I Victory Medal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miraflores (Panama)

The photo you added of the USS Missouri is fabulous. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:48, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Overground network.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Overground network.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LINK Train

All those succession templates are overkill when there is only one link. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the third station Toronto Pearson Viscount Station. Since you insisted in maintaining the succession templates for this line, I have gone ahead and added the one station you left out. Have a look and see if it needs tweaking. I have included references and coordinates. Secondarywaltz (talk) 11:47, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shada (Doctor Who), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denis Carey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Silkeborg-IF.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Silkeborg-IF.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image location

This may be of interest to you. WP:IMGLOC In particular, "avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other, or between an image and infobox, navigation template, or similar."

Sincerely, Orpy15 (talk) 21:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eileen Collins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meritorious Service Medal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William McGonagle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meritorious Service Medal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of men's national association football teams

Chinese Taipei is customarily listed alphabetically using T, not C. The alliance (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stade Louis II in Monaco

Hello. Thank you for creating Stade Louis II. I was wondering if you would consider adding more in-line references throughout the text please? Also, the first stadium was built by Jean-Baptiste Pastor in 1936. Perhaps there could be several sections--one historical, another one more "practical" or game-based? Please reply on my talkpage. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 08:44, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Hammersfan! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited USS Akron (ZRS-4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield Township, Ohio. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akron-class airship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Condenser. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian AWD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australian AWD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- saberwyn 10:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nick-D -- Nick-D (talk) 23:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Fleet Air Arm (RAN) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.

Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
Get involved in some of our special projects:
- Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
- Help develop a template for citing archival collections
- Write guides to accessing and using library resources

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naming of article on Ford

I've undone your edits to move the content of USS Gerald R. Ford to USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78). Per prior practice, if there are no other ships of the same name, no hull number is required in the name. See Nimitz-class aircraft carrier#Ships in class for examples. Further, if the article is to be renamed, it should be moved, not copied. See Wikipedia:Moving a page#Before moving a page where it says "Do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content, because doing so fragments the edit history". Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service

The article McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nick-D -- Nick-D (talk) 10:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Town-class cruiser (1910)

When you edited Town-class cruiser (1910) recently [8]. you deleted a large amount of cited information without any explanation, replacing cited information with uncited tables, and losing a lot of detail. Please be more careful in the future.Nigel Ish (talk) 08:45, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service

On 3 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the F-4J(UK) Phantoms used by the Royal Air Force were so different from other British Phantoms, they even required crews to wear American flying helmets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hudson River derby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Bull Arena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Knights, baronets and peers of the Protectorate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speaker of the House of Commons. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hobart class destroyer CG impression.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hobart class destroyer CG impression.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dundee football merger

Hello, I just wanted to explain my reasons for reverting your recent additions to Dundee F.C. and Dundee United F.C. regarding the claimed 1999 merger proposal involving the two clubs. While this topic has indeed been the subject of recent coverage in reliable sources, they have not been reporting it as established fact, but merely reporting that former SPL chief executive Roger Mitchell has made claims about what happened. The merger has never been reported as "fact", either at the time or subsequently; some current reports also include quotes in response from Peter Marr, Dundee owner at the time, refuting what Mitchell says. I think unless / until reliable third party sources state the merger plan as fact, it doesn't warrant inclusion in the articles. Jellyman (talk) 14:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R ANGLIAN Regiment Cap Badge.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R ANGLIAN Regiment Cap Badge.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Preserved EMUs of Southern Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail tube trains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Underground railway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Endurance.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Endurance.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Amsterdam Metro stations

Template:Amsterdam Metro stations has been nominated for merging with Template:Metro. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 18:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tworonnies.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tworonnies.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:GoLondonDutchflyer.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GoLondonDutchflyer.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail Mark 5, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:UNIT.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UNIT.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pathfinder tours.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Pathfinder tours.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sheffield Supertram tram-train artists' impression.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sheffield Supertram tram-train artists' impression.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal Welch Fusiliers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Welch Fusiliers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cheshire-Cap-Badge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cheshire-Cap-Badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service

Hi Hammersfan. I see that Ian and Peacemaker did some work on this and asked you to ping them back in June and July. (You can ping them by typing [[User:Ian Rose]] and [[User:Peacemaker67]].) Did you work on the things Peacemaker was asking about? Is it time to ping them? - Dank (push to talk) 21:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Class 707 artist's impression.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Class 707 artist's impression.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

F4 Phantom

As an FYI, I'd suggest finding a source for the line "Following the decommissioning of HMS Ark Royal in 1978, the Royal Navy was no longer able to operate conventional fixed wing aircraft at sea. The British Aerospace Sea Harrier was introduced into both the air defence (replacing the Phantom) and strike (replacing the Buccaneer) roles in the Fleet Air Arm with 800 NAS and 801 NAS in 1980", that does seem to be something that would require a citation if it were in the article mainspace. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:08, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While you're at it, I think that the F4 used to be based in Cyprus as well as the UK/Germany/Falklands entries. I'm not sure if the Ascencion Island flight was just a detachment or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by F4fvs (talk • contribs) 03:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious

what was wrong with the phrase "set sail": apropos your edit [9]?Axxxion (talk) 14:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Russian BCs

You need to find better sources for this featured list than global security, etc.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Translations

There is NO effective difference between "Fleet Admiral" and "Admiral of the Fleet" when translating from Russian to English.Moryak (talk) 23:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hammersfan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hammersfan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Thomas Cromwell does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Eric ^talk 03:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Military History Newcomer of the Year

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your contributions to the article "... McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service, [your] first Milhist GA (as far as [The ed17] can tell)", I have the honor of presenting you with this WikiProject Barnstar. For the Military history WikiProject, TomStar81 (Talk) 10:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2018 ConIFA World Football Cup qualification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niederdorf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mercian regiment.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mercian regiment.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2018 ConIFA World Football Cup qualification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAarmy.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SAarmy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Atlantaolympicstadium.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:UK private, military, crown dependency and overseas territory police forces

Template:UK private, military, crown dependency and overseas territory police forces has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

News NF-Board

Hello Hammersfan. I see that you will surely make all the page of the 2017 "Conifa European Football Cup". I will tell you that the NF-Board will soon be organizing new competitions: There will be the 2018 Viva World Cup – Women's tournament and a 2017 European Viva Men's Cup, for this Euro Will take place in the town of Vichy in France in the winter period. For the women's world, there will be the Maori women's team. There are opportunities for teams to participate in the next tournaments: Lapland, West Papua, Provence, Easter Island (Rapa Nui), Zanzibar and Greenland. The Facebook page talks about it is also local newspaper. www.lamontagne.fr — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE0E:ABD0:B854:9C74:3C1F:E26D (talk) 23:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need your support

Hello Hammersfan, I wish to have your opinion on the page that I have created in French compared to your article in English: 2017 ConIFA European Football Cup

I also create the articles in French of the previous edition and the two 2014 and 2016 ConIFA World Football Cup.

Some on the French wikipedia does not accept the fact that I create articles on non-fifa teams and competitions Conifa and NF-Board. It is limited if it is not FIFA, it must don't be on wikipedia. I realize that its people do not practice neutrality and impartiality on wikipedia. I would have liked your help to conserve the article and they others. Cordially. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE0E:ABD0:B854:9C74:3C1F:E26D (talk) 00:48, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Duke of lancaster's.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Duke of lancaster's.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Daily Record Jock Stein death.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Daily Record Jock Stein death.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1995 Royal Air Force Nimrod R1 crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1995 Royal Air Force Nimrod R1 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1995 Royal Air Force Nimrod R1 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Petebutt (talk) 01:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you are probably aware, it was kept. As noted in the discussion, the article should now be moved from crash to ditching. If you have no objections, you can do the job yourself.

P.S. Ever thought of archiving? Mjroots (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ConIFA

The 2018 ConIFA World Cup takes place in London, England.

BFA : We aim to participate in competitions governed and organised by CONIFA to help reach our goal of competing in the World Cup 2018. The BFA is organised and managed by Somali diaspora living in the United Kingdom. With the ultimate goal of creating the opportunity to develop awareness, improve and better the living standards and conditions in the south region of Somalia.

I did my little research and there is absolutely nothing that says it's Barawa, unless you prove the opposite, moreover London is rather a neutral zone. 2014: Sapmi, 2016: Abkhazia, 2018: London.

In logic it is a world cup in a territory member of ConIFA, there is a community of Barawa in London but there is also a huge community Tamil.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Belfast–Bangor railway line

Template:Belfast–Bangor railway line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 10:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Belfast–Derry railway line

Template:Belfast–Derry railway line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Belfast–Larne railway line

Template:Belfast–Larne railway line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Belfast–Newry railway line

Template:Belfast–Newry railway line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hammersfan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trans-Dublin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trans-Dublin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans-Dublin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gnevin (talk) 11:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trans-Dublin

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Trans-Dublin, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Davey2010^Talk 13:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NIFMs

Template:NIFMs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 ConIFA World Football Cup

Hello. The Siwel newspaper in Algeria in Kabylie the calendar of matches of the 4 groups of the 2018 ConIFA World Football Cup. https://www.siwel.info/coupe-du-monde-de-football-2018-conifa-voici-le-calendrier-des-matchs-de-la-kabylie_53662.html

http://www.eventim.co.uk/tickets.html?affiliate=EUK&doc=artistPages%2Ftickets&fun=artist&action=tickets&erid=2120589&includeOnlybookable=false&x10=1&x11=World%20Football — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE0E:ABD0:B854:9C74:3C1F:E26D (talk) 01:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 20:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ConIFA World Football Cup

Hey, I saw you have edited the 2018 ConIFA World Football Cup lots, would it be possible for you to add Haringey Borough's stadium to the list of hosts please? I would try to add it myself but don't want to mess up the map! Haringey have been announced as a host here. Cam Melling (talk) 09:29, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Forth

I reverted the changes where you said that HMS Forth was commissioned today. I watched the video coverage of her arrival into Portsmouth and there was no sign of preparations for an immediate commissioning ceremony, and I would be very surprised if she were to be commissioned on the day of her arrival. The RN report of her arrival makes no mention of her being commissioned. Naturally if you have a WP:RS for her being commissioned today it will be fine for you to put the info back in. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Two of a Kind (UK TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Tell me is it normal that the French wikipedia, there is abuse of power especially when it comes to articles on teams or competitions of ConIFA? A person on the wiki-FR is mistaken for the god or the master of wikipedia, besides the person although she spent 10 years of her life on wiki with 200 000 articles in a large number has no sources and has repeatedly broken the rules, boasts of being a football expert while he is not a graduate, nor playing football in a club. So is it normal to see this kind of person take himself for the wiki leader and be the decision maker of everything? I will not be surprised that one day he asks for the suppression of some teams on the wiki-ENG version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE0E:ABD0:D599:F39C:7A99:47B0 (talk) 10:44, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RSDG TRF.PNG

The file File:RSDG TRF.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Den kongelige livgarde.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Den kongelige livgarde.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Page boy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Referees of the 2018 ConIFA World Football Cup

Referees
Raymond Mashamba
Nyanda Francis Gwai
Sherpard Thambo
Andrew Sidambe
Dmitrii Zhukov
Vitalii Mazin
Valerii Kravchenko
Aleksandr Demenko
Givi Todua
Kristian Michel
Vinze Otten
Tomasz Pirman
David Murphy
James Turpin
Denis Pérez González
Andrew Mario Parody
Utku Hamamcioglu
Fehim Dayi
Zekai Tore
Isfendiyar Açiksoz
Esposito Pasquale
Mario Guastafierro
Massimo Amitrano
Mario Sasso

Tibet Team 2018 ConIFA World Football Cup

No. Full Name Date of birth Position Caps Goals Club Division Country of Club Note
1 Tenzin Samdup 23/12/1992 Goalkeeper 1 7 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
21 Sangye Gyatso 5/6/1987 Goalkeeper 2 2 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
3 Tenzin Bhakdo 8/5/1996 Defender 3 1 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
23 Dawa Tashi 16/4/1987 Defender 6 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
13 Tenzingh Dhonden Bhutia 13/12/1994 Defender 2 1 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
15 Tenzin Gelek 5/10/1989 Defender 2 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
5 Gelek Wangchuk 15/9/1992 Defender 3 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
8 Tenzin Dhondup 1/7/1995 Defender 0 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
18 Tenzin Yougyal 8/12/1993 Defender 0 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
19 Tenzin choepak 1/7/1996 Defender 0 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
17 Ruden Tshering Tashi Dorjee Bhutia 11/12/1991 Mid-fielder 0 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
2 Thupten Tsering Sangatsang 17/1/1994 Mid-fielder 0 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
6 B.K Narayan 25/11/1991 Mid-fielder 7 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
14 Karma Tsewang 1/10/1988 Mid-fielder 2 1 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
12 Kalsang Phuntsok Lungkara 9/5/1995 Mid-fielder 0 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
4 Tenzin Loedup 21/12/1991 Mid-fielder 2 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
11 Kalsang Topgyal 24/12/1996 Striker 3 1 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
7 Tsering Chomphel 18/11/1992 Striker 2 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
10 Tenzin Thardoe 15/3/1998 Striker 2 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
22 Tenzing Tsering 16/11/1995 Striker 2 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
9 Pema Lhundup Sherpa 11/2/1996 Striker 2 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
20 Tashi Samphel 5/7/1987 Striker 1 5 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet
16 Tenzin Norbu Tekhang 13/6/1996 Striker 0 0 Tibetan Foot Ball Club 1 Tibet

Penpa Tsering 2/3/1960 Head Coach Tibetan National Sports Association 1 Tibet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE0E:ABD0:B854:9C74:3C1F:E26D (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kent and Sharpshooters Yeomanry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kent and Sharpshooters Yeomanry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 2018 ConIFA World Football Cup edits

Hello! Just wanted to say thanks for helping out on the 2018 ConIFA World Football Cup page with your edits! However I just wanted to remind you that standard practise on all football articles, including the ConIFA ones (see the previous tournaments, 2014, 2016 and other football tournament articles) is to place to goal times after the goalscorer's name, including for the away team. This is to provide clarity and to ensure that we have a regular format. Regards, BarnabyJoe (talk) 08:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chagos Football Association.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chagos Football Association.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Conifa logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Conifa logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:02, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PWRR TRF.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PWRR TRF.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ConIFA

I have a simple question or could you solve this little problem. As you know each ConIFA article and competitions are related by the other articles in the interlanged versions. But the German articles of the 2015 ConIFA European Football Cup (CONIFA-Europafußballmeisterschaft 2015) and the 2017 ConIFA European Football Cup (CONIFA-Europafußballmeisterschaft 2017), do not link to other languages. could you associate German versions with other articles in English. Cordially. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE0E:ABD0:21B2:63FF:AF44:B673 (talk) 11:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:RRF TRF.GIF listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RRF TRF.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Croke Park railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Croke Park railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croke Park railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Just curious why you re-added this after I just removed it. It's trivia and has nothing to do with the ship, certainly not her sea trials, the section it's in. - wolf 20:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was during the stopover at Invergordon on sea trials, because it was deemed newsworthy by a number of outlets, and because it takes up one line.

File source problem with File:RCD cap badge.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:RCD cap badge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:29, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Loamshire Regiment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loamshire Regiment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loamshire Regiment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:19, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wiki Swenden ConIFA tournaments

Hello, I would like to highlight a problem. A person on the Swedish wikipedia has created the 3 articles on the ConIFA World Cup 2014, 2016, 2018 and the 2 articles on ConIFA European Cup 2015, 2017. The person had to create the articles correctly, it was just missing the texts. All in summer removed on October 14, 2018.

Could not we restore them to help this person perfect his 5 contributions by putting the necessary texts?

Here is the discussion between the creator of the 5 articles and the Swedish administrator: sv:Användardiskussion:2.69.160.160 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE0E:ABD0:B854:9C74:3C1F:E26D (talk) 12:12, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Regimental Color.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Regimental Color.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

QE R08

Hi, if your editing ship articles regularly, I take it you follow WT:SHIPS? The consensus there seems to be for ship articles to focus more on the ships, as opposed to items such as non-notable crew and trivia. This is why I removed the info about the change of commanders (and the note about sailing near the QE cruise ship... WP is not news after all) The ship is just in her first year and the article is already over 50 kB, which means the content will need to more relevant and focused on the ship as the page grows larger. I'm just letting you know why, and likely other editors as well, will make these kinds of edits, going forward. Have a nice day – wolf 22:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Thought you might find this link useful. - wolf 23:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women's football team ConIFA

Will there be female ConIFA teams soon? It already exists in the other languages French, Occitan, Swedish, Italian, Suomi, ect ....

Others

Åland Islands women's football team (champions, 3 titles 2007, 2009, 2011 Football at the Island Games, finalist 2001, 2005, 2015)
South Tyrol women's football team (champion Europeada 2016)
South Tyrol football team (men's) (champion Europeada 2008, Europeada 2012 and Europeada 2016)

Just want to ask about List of British Army Regiments (2008)

Why was it created? There aren't any references and wouldn't it be better to include it as a history in Structure of the British Army?

Thanks

Sammartinlai (talk) 04:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List 2008

Ah ok, thanks. Just noting it is unsourced and rather long. Will you be working on it?

Sammartinlai (talk) 10:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Type 26 frigate

Asking your view on the Type 26 frigate article. There's a template at the bottom on 'Commissioned ships of the Royal Navy' or

. Is that right to have such a template? The article is about a ship class not about commissioned ships. None of the ships listed at current are commissioned into the Royal Navy or even launched. Should the template stay?

Thanks

Sammartinlai (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hammersfan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Night Riviera logo.PNG

The file File:Night Riviera logo.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi do you think it should be Type 31 or 31e

frigate, I mean Type 31 frigate since the NSS and previously [10] refers to it as the Type 31e? Thanks. Sammartinlai (talk) 06:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks though I may disagree I won't push it further. Sammartinlai (talk) 11:13, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Samir Nasri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Warspite

There is a discussion on the talk page you might wish to comment on Lyndaship (talk) 19:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not acceptable – do not replace good photograph with an awful one that you took

this is not acceptable.

You Really should not replace a photograph that is good quality with one such as you did below. You should especially not do this when this is one of your own photos.

Sunshine, blue skies, no shadows.
this is beyond awful. It is backlit, overexposed, small, and badly composed (the subject is too centred).

Thank you for your understanding.

Orphaned non-free image File:Class 471 Main Line Networker.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Class 471 Main Line Networker.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:LONDON REGT TRF.PNG

The file File:LONDON REGT TRF.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RM Commando Flash.JPG

The file File:RM Commando Flash.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Special Reconnaissance Regiment (crest).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Special Reconnaissance Regiment (crest).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Ramillies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Copenhagen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kaartin Jääkärirykmentti.PNG

The file File:Kaartin Jääkärirykmentti.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Northdale TRF.PNG

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Duke of Lancaster's TRF.PNG

The file File:Duke of Lancaster's TRF.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:LD TRF.PNG

The file File:LD TRF.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RGJ TRF.PNG

The file File:RGJ TRF.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Light Infantry TRF.PNG

The file File:Light Infantry TRF.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Type 31 or Type 31e frigate

What should be the proper name for Type 31 frigate? Should it be Type 31 or Type 31e as government sources say so?

BlueD954 (talk) 15:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Type 31. I believe Type 31e was to indicate that it is an export version Hammersfan (talk) 20:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So many government documents refer to it as Type 31e. I'll not debate it to the end. BlueD954 (talk) 01:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:QRL TRF.PNG

The file File:QRL TRF.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Relocation of Wimbledon F.C. to Milton Keynes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Callum Reilly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection

Hi, it appears that you tried to create a redirect at USS Galveston (CLG 3), but didn't do it correctly. I've fixed it now. For future reference, the correct redirect syntax is:

#REDIRECT [[target page name]]

You can check redirects with the Preview button before saving them. If you have created a working redirect, the preview will show the name of the target page alongside a bent arrow (or "Redirect to:" label in text mode). — Smjg (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Gideon

The article Matthew Gideon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Gideon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Gideon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Gideon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RBLF badge.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RBLF badge.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ScotlandNational.PNG

The file File:ScotlandNational.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FnqrAO.JPG

The file File:FnqrAO.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maps of police forces of Scotland

A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of police forces of Scotland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lightinfantry.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lightinfantry.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Northdale rifles.PNG

The file File:Northdale rifles.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DDLI TRF.PNG

The file File:DDLI TRF.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Paras DZ Flash.GIF

The file File:Paras DZ Flash.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:PWO nameplate.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Gentlemen-at-Arms.PNG

The file File:Gentlemen-at-Arms.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kings-Badge.jpg

The file File:Kings-Badge.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Richmond (F239), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MTU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FrancePolice.PNG

The file File:FrancePolice.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited W1A (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Morton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GibraltarPolice.PNG

The file File:GibraltarPolice.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RCMP Shoulder flash.PNG

The file File:RCMP Shoulder flash.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of British Army incremental infantry companies

Hello! Your submission of British Army incremental infantry companies at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Australian cricket team in South Africa in 1985–86 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chris Broad

British Forces Cyprus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Army Reserve

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for British Army incremental infantry companies

On 7 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article British Army incremental infantry companies, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1990s, some British Army infantry battalions suffered such severe manpower shortages that they had to be reinforced by companies of Gurkhas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British Army incremental infantry companies. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, British Army incremental infantry companies), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited McDonnell Douglas Phantom in UK service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration

Hi. Yes, happy to collaborate on McDonnell Douglas Phantom in UK service. It's a good Good Article. Thanks for the feedback on F-111, apologies for getting that wrong. On the in/on aircraft carrier – I stand corrected that that 'in' is grammatically correct, but I just bumped on it when I read it. (I've found recent examples too e.g. [11])

If you're happy to look at some of the factual queries I raised I'll do some copyediting? Mark83 (talk) 06:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mark83 – that was going to be my suggestion as well – I'll go through your list when I have some time, and let you know once I'm done.

Nomination for deletion of Template:England squad UEFA Nations League Finals 2019

Template:England squad UEFA Nations League Finals 2019 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Groups – brigade sized?

I'm contesting groups in the template – Template:Current British brigades as brigade-sized units. Fine, they contain around three regiments, but besides the Specialised Infantry Group, 25 (Close Support) Engineer Group and 7th Air Defence Group are not commanded by Brigadiers and just very close support units, not brigades or brigade-sized in any sense as in brigades like 2nd Medical Brigade (United Kingdom), 101 Logistic Brigade, 104th Logistic Support Brigade (United Kingdom).

Same with HQ North West and South West. They are Colonel-led at best and not exact brigades.

BlueD954 (talk) 02:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

McDonnell Douglas Phantom in UK service Sandbox Link

Hi Hammersfan. The link on this article to your sandbox page (User:Hammersfan/McDonnell Douglas Phantom in UK service – data) are not approriate – sandbox pages are not subject to the same editorial scrutiny as articles, having a link like this suggests it is an accepted article. I didn't want to just remove the link, is there someway around this, perhaps merging it with the main page, or making it an article?--Jac16888 ^Talk 12:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the discussion on the talk page, you'll see that the page is not intended as a sandbox, but as a page of data that, during the amendment process to get the article fit for FA submission, was thought to be not appropriate to have on the page itself, but which I felt was important to retain and be accessible. I have therefore characterised the page I have set up as an open access page of data, akin to the publication of data sets in a journal article. However, if you believe it better to set up an actual page, i have done so and linked to this. Hammersfan (talk) 12:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of McDonnell Douglas Phantom in UK service – data

The article McDonnell Douglas Phantom in UK service – data has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of List of British Army Regiments (2008)

The article List of British Army Regiments (2008) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlueD954 (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of British Army Regiments (2008) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of British Army Regiments (2008), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British Army Regiments (2008) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of British Army Regiments (2008) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of British Army Regiments (2008) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British Army Regiments (2008) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlueD954 (talk) 08:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of international cricket centuries at the Antigua Recreation Ground for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international cricket centuries at the Antigua Recreation Ground, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at Carisbrook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Life-Guards badge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Life-Guards badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:QDG Cap Badge.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:QDG Cap Badge.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Slipback novel.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Slipback novel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Class 484 Island Line artist's impression.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Class 484 Island Line artist's impression.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pathfinder Tours

The article Pathfinder Tours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OnlyRegisteredUsersMatter (talk) 15:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pflogo 02b.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pflogo 02b.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

parliamentary incumbency

Hi Hammersfan,

You are of course correct about Brecon and Radnorshire. The incumbent party did indeed change at the 2019 election.

However the practice at wikipedia on constituency pages is to allocate hold or gain depending on the previous general election not the by-election.

If you have a look here: 2019 United Kingdom general election#Seats changing hands you will notice that Brecon and Radnorshire is not included in the list of seats changing hands. Nor is it the case here: Rochester and Strood (UK Parliament constituency)#Elections in the 2010s

Interested to hear your thoughts. Won't revert or edit for a few days until I hear back from you.

Cheers

Benawu2 (talk) 04:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erik Rhodes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR notice

I have nominated Doctor Who missing episodes for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 01:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL with disclaimers

Hi! Long time ago you uploaded some files like File:RASR UCP.PNG. They are licensed {{GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}}. Perhaps you would be willing to remove the disclaimers? See Wikipedia:GFDL standardization for further information. If you would like to remove the disclaimers you can click this link and search for you name (22 files). --MGA73 (talk) 20:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Class 447 Battersea Bullet.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Class 447 Battersea Bullet.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The West Wing task force

Hi there! If you're receiving this, it's because you like The West Wing—I happen to love the show, and I'm trying to set up a task force for it under Wikipedia:WikiProject Television to improve its coverage on Wikipedia. If you'd like to join, please leave your name here—hope to see you there!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pwrr cap badge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pwrr cap badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:D&D.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:D&D.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kings regiment badge.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kings regiment badge.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Future tense

Hiya. In relation to the sequence of edits at Dublin Area Rapid Transit, I would respectfully note that the future is not certain. And it would ideally not be represented as if it is.

Absent a WP:CRYSTALBALL (and if 2020/2021 has taught us anything) we would ideally avoid terms that imply definitive future events (like "X will happen") when other forms of wording are available to us (like "X is proposed to happen"). As expected by the WP:PRECISELANG and related guidelines. This is particularly true of the future perfect tense.

In 2008, for example, you stated (in the St Stephen's Green station article) that it "will feature an underground [DART] stop". No qualification or conditionality. And similarly that there "will be a deep bore [Metro] tunnel" by 2013. No qualification or conditionality. Will DEFINITELY have two underground platforms by 2013 and 2015. None of these things happened. By 2013 or 2015 or even by 2021. And may never happen.

In 2009, again, you stated (in an article about a station near Christchurch Cathedral) that it "will be one of five new underground facilities", "will be located next to Christ Church", and "will be the only new station on the route not to connect with [..the..] Metro". Again, no qualification or conditionality. Will DEFINITELY exist. From 2015. Again, something which never happened. And is unlikely to ever happen. (But didn't stop several people from creating articles in other languages which implied that it had already happened).

In short: I don't see why we would use the definitive future tense (like "will") or related words (like "future") when other perfectly reasonable and less hubris-laden words are available to us ("planned", "proposed", etc).

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:King's Own Scottish Borderers logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:King's Own Scottish Borderers logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal Gurkha Rifles.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Gurkha Rifles.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal Regiment of Wales (insignia).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Regiment of Wales (insignia).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RHF.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RHF.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quatermass and the Pit under FA review

I have nominated Quatermass and the Pit for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --George Ho (talk) 00:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dreadnought-class submarine

Template:Dreadnought-class submarine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RoyalCompanyArchers badge.PNG

The file File:RoyalCompanyArchers badge.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:20, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ASOB/RGR

Dear Hammersfan! You try to (partly) undo changes i made to Army Special Operations Brigade. To my knowledge Coriano/RGR is attached to 4 RANGER (and was so longer time – proof available!). I provided cite for it. The cite for Falklands/RGR states only that it serves along Coriano in brigade. That is not a statement that A (now G) is or was attached to 2PWRR. So please don't change without providing cite proofing otherwise--88.69.144.65 (talk) 11:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Luas insert

Template:Luas insert has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piggymalone.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Piggymalone.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/54

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/54 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/53

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/53 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/50

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/50 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/52

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/52 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/51

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro right/51 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro left/54

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro left/54 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro left/51

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro left/51 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro left/52

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro left/52 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro left/50

Template:S-line/Amsterdam Metro left/50 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Amsterdam Metro stations

Template:Amsterdam Metro stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Amsterdam Metro lines

Template:Amsterdam Metro lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. REEDriler (talk) 20:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

You’ve made a fine article out of the Sinking of HMS Victoria. Have some Mediterranean Baklava for a job well done! CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 20:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of fictional regiments of the British Army for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional regiments of the British Army is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional regiments of the British Army until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LCR left/Shenfield

Template:S-line/LCR left/Shenfield has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LCR right/Shenfield

Template:S-line/LCR right/Shenfield has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Embarked military force

The article Embarked military force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jamaicadefenceforce.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jamaicadefenceforce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chief of the Air Staff

Many thanks for your excellent work on this and other articles. My understanding is that the Prime minister has not yet confirmed the appointment despite the speculation in the press. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 15:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if it is on the RAF website, I suppose it must have been confirmed. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Proteus

Thank you for your contributions to the article covering the RFA Proteus. Xtrememachineuk (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kings-Royal-Hussars cap badge.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kings-Royal-Hussars cap badge.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 19:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Umbro Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umbro Cup, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbro Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RoyalAustralianArmouredCorps.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RoyalAustralianArmouredCorps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saratoga ribbon bar

Thanks for the addition, but it needs to be sourced if it's going to stay. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi Hammersfan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 18:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:World Series Cricket Grounds

Template:World Series Cricket Grounds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Torontoscottish.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Torontoscottish.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Creek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bird.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]