Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Easter Bunny
From photographer André Karwath (a.k.a. Aka). Currently illustrates Easter and kitsch.
- Nominate and support. Sandover 06:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support - I like the absence of background shadow, and the excellent focus (even on the highest res version) - Adrian Pingstone 08:03, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support good picture, illustrates kitsch well I'd say. Junes 09:11, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose Too tacky for words. It may illustrate its article well, but as an image, it is seriously underwhelming in its brilliance. Denni☯ 23:49, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
- Did you look up kitsch? This is just the sort of found object that Jeff Koons would re-create in porcelain and sell in a pricey New York art gallery. If any image epitomizes kitsch, this does. Are you sure you're not faulting the photograph for living up so well to its appropriate Wikipedia category? Sandover 05:55, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- No, I'm faulting the photo for not meeting a single one of the criteria for featured picture. It is flat out boring; I would not be surprised to run into a similar image in a Wal-mart flyer. Denni☯ 23:04, 2005 Apr 6 (UTC)
- Please don't fault me for making this photo. As well as the vase below, it was never planned to be a featured picture candidate and I think it should not be here. I just wanted to illustrate an article with it and tried to create a simple, clean, technically well done picture. Please have a look at my user page in the commons for other pictures. -- Aka 06:32, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- No, I'm faulting the photo for not meeting a single one of the criteria for featured picture. It is flat out boring; I would not be surprised to run into a similar image in a Wal-mart flyer. Denni☯ 23:04, 2005 Apr 6 (UTC)
- Oppose - not very interesting. ed g2s • talk 15:30, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not interesting. Enochlau 10:47, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Corny. Need I say more?--Zxcvbnm 00:50, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose -Shudder.--Deglr6328 07:08, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose What more needs to be said? --Fir0002 06:11, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. No comments. Jonas Olson 09:58, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Serves the indended purpose very well. Very good as a product shot. Alight 19:30, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Not promoted +4 / -8 -- Solipsist 16:24, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)