Talk:313

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

313 - the Gamefaqs.com board number of a huge regional board, with members covering almost every corner of Britain. Discussion is varied, as are the members. Discuss. (unsigned 17:13, 18 Apr 2005 62.255.64.9)

The king of which named Matey101 has all of lue bow down to him in understanding that 313 > lue.

The article has been protected because of vanadalism associated with the 313 board. Ask an admin if you have an encyclopedic edit to make. --Henrygb 21:53, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No, unacceptable. The burden is on us to keep reverting vandalism and keep blocking vandals, not on users to ask for the privilege of editing the page just because there are a lot of morons in the world. Unprotected. JRM · Talk 09:23, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)

"Unacceptable" is a strong word when Wikipedia:Protection policy says "A temporary protection is used for protecting a page or image that has been a recent target of persistent vandalism". This page has been protected in the past for the same reason, unprotected and then vandalised in a similar way again. The last 50+ edits have added nothing to the page. Let's see what happens next. --Henrygb 10:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Its a great idea having something for 313...

however if there is something that is created, that most people can say that is fair, then would there be any chance of having it locked or something along those lines!

Jamie McAndrew - Vervecroftmacca

There is a mention of the troublesome GameFAQs at 313 (number). --Henrygb 00:15, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]