Talk:Magic: The Gathering

The good article status of this article is being reassessed by the community to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page.

^{Date: 16:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)}

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magic: The Gathering article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 3 months

Magic: The Gathering has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 19, 2005	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
February 2, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
December 2, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
April 28, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
August 11, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 5, 2023.
Current status: Good article

Jace Beleren was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 03 February 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Magic: The Gathering. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Planeswalker was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 October 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Magic: The Gathering. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Games (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Games, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GamesWikipedia:WikiProject GamesTemplate:WikiProject GamesGames articles

Magic: The Gathering

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic: The Gathering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Magic: The Gathering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Magic: The GatheringWikipedia:WikiProject Magic: The GatheringTemplate:WikiProject Magic: The GatheringMagic: The Gathering articles

Board and table games High‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

vice Presidential candidate JD Vance admits to playing magic The gathering in his book Hillbilly Elegy since 1999

author and vice presidential candidate JD Vance admits to being a player of magic The gathering since 1999 in his book Hillbilly Elegy 75.118.50.197 (talk) 05:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A number of years ago, I suggested an episode of Family Guy where a suicide bomber goes to Paradise to claim his 72 virgins, only to find they are in fact 72 unmarried Star Trek fans who are "just about to play a game of Magic: The Gathering"; but was slapped down because it lacked notability, or some such nonsense. Uh-huh. This time next year, ask someone who the hell J.D.Vance used to be.

Nuttyskin (talk) 04:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

There are uncited passages in the text, including entire paragraphs.
There are several sections that are quite long: these should have the text reduced or split with level 3 headings.
This article is over 10,000 words: WP:TOOBIG recommends that articles this big should be spun out or have the prose trimmed. I think this article should consider reducing the prose.

Is anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duel Masters and Destroy all humans

It would be good to mention "Duel Masters" (until 2002) and "Destroy All Humans. They Can't Be Regenerated" manga and anime. which are based on MTG.Not sure where to put it in the article. 185.18.60.54 (talk) 11:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Magic: The Gathering

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result pending

There is uncited text throughout the article, including entire sections and paragraphs. At over 11,000 words, this article is considered WP:TOOBIG and is probably too detailed in some areas. Some sections are quite large, affecting readability especially for mobile users. If there is still a lot of text in some of these sections after the prose is reduced, I recommend that it be broken up with headings. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]