Talk:Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920)

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 18, 2011, January 18, 2012, January 18, 2016, and January 18, 2017.

European history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: Law Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law.

Military history: World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War I task force

France: Paris Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

Page moves

The page has just been moved for the third time in 5 months. This is clearly too many moves in such a short time. I would ask that no further moves are made without a requested move discussion. Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 00:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American approach

This section says that the Charter of the League of Nations conflicted with the US Constitution. However it does not say which articles conflicted. Neither does the article on the League of Nations. Can somebody add in where the conflict was? I don't have the source. Spinney Hill (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese approach

Can anybody help us with what this quote means?

 "The Japanese delegation became unhappy after it had received only half of the rights of Germany, "

What rights? Certainly not the rights to address the conference.

Palestine

I'm not sure what the following means. Can anyone enlighten us? "A Jewish Council representative for the development of the Jewish National Home in Palestine, and offer to the council in priority any concession for public works or for the development of natural resources The self-government for localities"

This was badly edited and demonstrates the vexation attendant on the current disdain for punctuation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.81.8 (talk) 22:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New States in Europe?

I am missing a section on the political geography of Europe, the border adjustments, and the creation of Finland, the Baltic states, Poland, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Austria. This seems just as important as the mandates, which have their own section. I would appreciate if someone took the time to add this. --95.89.78.72 (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Judgements

This article contains a number of statements which, in my opinion, represent judgements on behalf of the editor which are inappropriate or require sources. For example:

"That provision proved very humiliating for German leaders, armies and citizens alike, and set the stage for the expensive reparations that Germany was intended to pay."

Whether or not it was "very humiliating" for each of those groups should at be supported by a reference.How "expensive" the reparations were should be quantified, or at least cited. To my knowledge there is reasonable difference among historians as to how onerous the reparations were, for example, and it seems misleading to state that they were "expensive" without some supporting numbers or references. 31.4.179.67 (talk) 12:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Partly covered by my edit Spinney Hill (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]