Talk:APNG

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Is MNG really a competitor?

I believe the third paragraph would more accurately describe APNG as a successor or replacement for MNG, not a competitor to it.

My reasons are:

Despite being called "Multi-image Network Graphics", no current browsers support MNG
The only browsers MNG was supported in were Netscape & Firefox
Mozilla, the makers of Firefox, created APNG as a replacement for MNG

Yes, I think this should be better reflected in the article. Benimation (talk) 14:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The simplicity of the format, plus the Specification Revisions, gives a feeling it's just a quick hack of PNG.
Should we mention this ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musaran (talk • contribs) 19:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The table does not yet list ImageMagick. Can someone add whether ImageMagick supports this or not please? 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 17:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]